Related links
Related links
Posted Oct 24, 2024 12:34 UTC (Thu) by dgn (guest, #132630)In reply to: Related links by paulj
Parent article: Several Russian developers lose kernel maintainership status
You do realize that working for a tech company that does less than a single-digit percentage of their revenue dealing with the military-industrial complex is not comparable to a company actually producing weapons as part of that industry, do you? Apart from the fact that the genocide you mention is not even carried out by the US but an ally, so there's another level of indirection.
> I happen to actually be very very open to that argument.
I'm sure you are and have been for a long time, and I'm certain nobody cares.
Posted Oct 24, 2024 12:48 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (7 responses)
They probably could still operate, but they would also probably suffer from not-entirely-trivial inefficiencies which they do not have today.
There's no point getting into weeds on arguments about whether there is a genocide ongoing at moment.
There very obviously is to everyone in the world, bar a very small set of people. The ICJ - the authoritative body - already ruled, quite a while ago, that the threshold for action (i.e., by it on proceeding with the case, and also on states for acting to prevent genocide) on the /possibility/ for genocide had been reached. It is also a fact that the acts which obviously are genocide to all in the world, bar a small set, could not have occurred without the support of the USA - both political, operationally, and materially in terms of _very large_ quantities of bombs (more tonnage of HE than that dropped on a number of major cities in Europe in all of WWII combined), and it is a fact the USA provided that support while in possession of the same knowledge the rest of the world has (and more, given the vast SIGINT and IMINT resources it has). Those are just facts.
Posted Oct 24, 2024 13:20 UTC (Thu)
by dgn (guest, #132630)
[Link] (5 responses)
Those organisations are all big enough to afford their own teams doing that support for them. It would just cost them more than buying the equivalent product. Which in the end might just mean that they would not use FOSS in the first place, as using proprietary solutions might come cheaper.
While I completely agree that the thought of somebody using one's own work to do terrible things is abhorrent, I disagree with the guilty-by-association dogma that so many people have. Working for Meta is absolutely not the same as dropping bombs - I think Meta's business model is responsible for a lot of things that are wrong about the internet today, and that's a problem, not their possible business association with Lockheed-Martin. Even working for Lockheed-Martin is not the same as dropping bombs. Somebody's got to build rockets and bombs, that's sadly the way it is. Instead of judging people for doing that work you should be glad you don't have to do it, like you might have to in some fascist dystopia.
When it comes to the people actually taking decisions to drop bombs on civilians, that's a different matter and here we can talk about personal and moral responsibility. But then the circle shrinks substantially and it becomes very, very hard to identify those people.
Posted Oct 25, 2024 11:05 UTC (Fri)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (4 responses)
1. I see value in holding people responsible for the choices to make, including who they work for and the impact of that work on the world.
2. I see that the world is incredibly shitty place, and (ignoring the issue of dual-use technologies - you may work on something for its positive uses, but you can't control the negative uses) so much work these days is via very large corporates, with many interconnections, that you almost can not avoid working for corporates with connections to pretty shitty other corporates.
No doubt stuff I have worked on has been used for things that a number of people would consider "bad" or even "evil". E.g., I have done contracting to fix issues and improve networking software - many uses - but I did that work for a company in the oil industry, and their aim was to more efficiently find more oil for us to burn. Etc.
3. I see a lot of hypocrisy. Really, we just have different "tribes", each aligned around a few different "great powers". Each of which is guilty of great evil around the world. Each claims moral superiority, and decries the evil of the others. And the circus continues and continues, while the bodies of children pile up. The children I killed are all unfortunate accidents, collateral damage, and ultimately the responsibility of the evil terrorists who forced me to bomb children. The children /you/ killed are proof of your utter depravity.
---
The reference to Meta was not about an association to Lockheed-Martin. There are credible allegations that Meta has been providing meta-data from WhatsApp to the IDF, which the IDF then uses for targeting.
But... not really for LWN. Ping me and meet me in Dublin for a pint, for anyone who wants to debate this further.
Posted Oct 25, 2024 11:42 UTC (Fri)
by malmedal (subscriber, #56172)
[Link] (3 responses)
Can you stop writing slanderous and inflammatory statements on LWN? Ukraine vs Russia is clear good vs evil. And stop muddying the issue with unrelated conflicts.
Current Russian discourse is actually clearer than what the Nazis wrote in their papers. (We read some of it in German class)
Posted Oct 25, 2024 12:19 UTC (Fri)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (2 responses)
You appear to be completely misreading my comments. You appear to be responding to some other argument in your head that you've had with other people somewhere, which you are projecting onto my comments, for whatever reading.
Posted Oct 25, 2024 13:33 UTC (Fri)
by malmedal (subscriber, #56172)
[Link] (1 responses)
Indeed, they are not relevant to the issue at hand or to LWN.
> I stated *all* the great powers are involved in great evil around the world.
An untrue and extremely inflammatory statement. It reads like the powers are morally equal and doing the same things. This is not true. Russia is trying to create chaos. The US is trying to calm things down. China is mostly but unfortunately not completely with calming things down.
> You appear to be completely misreading my comments.
Your comments imply that you are completely ignorant of the rules of war and what belligerents can and cannot do. You really should educate yourself and discuss it in a relevant forum instead of here.
Posted Oct 25, 2024 13:39 UTC (Fri)
by jake (editor, #205)
[Link]
thanks,
jake
Posted Oct 24, 2024 17:32 UTC (Thu)
by malmedal (subscriber, #56172)
[Link]
Also your "facts" are not factual:
> The ICJ - the authoritative body - already ruled, quite a while ago, that the threshold for action (i.e., by it on proceeding with the case, and also on states for acting to prevent genocide) on the /possibility/ for genocide had been reached.
No, that is not what they said.
From: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3g9g63jl17o
> The judges had stressed they did not need to say for now whether a genocide had occurred but concluded that some of the acts South Africa complained about, if they were proven, could fall under the United Nations’ Convention on Genocide.
Regarding Russia, the ICJ has already ruled:
From: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/...
> The Russian Federation shall immediately suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine
Also, ICC(different court) has an arrest warrant out for Putin:
https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges...
But again, the issue at hand are the excluded developers, which of them, if any, should not have been excluded?
Related links
Related links
>
> They probably could still operate, but they would also probably suffer from not-entirely-trivial inefficiencies which they do not have today.
Related links
On "Somebody's got to build rockets and bombs, that's sadly the way it is." - well, in a world where the M-I-complex was being deployed for defensive purposes, ok, you can easily justify that morally. In a world where, for many decades now, the output of that complex is primarily used by the richest and most developed nations in the world to kill poor people in underdeveloped countries in vast numbers, for the ultimate aim of gaining control (directly or less directly by installing a more sympathetic gov) of their resources, such work is... a lot more questionable. The western "rules based order" has completely lost its moral compass since WWII, in my opinion, your opinion may differ.
Related links
Related links
Related links
Let's stop this here
Related links