Related links

You're ignoring what the article is about: Are there any of these developers that should not have been on the list?

Also your "facts" are not factual:

> The ICJ - the authoritative body - already ruled, quite a while ago, that the threshold for action (i.e., by it on proceeding with the case, and also on states for acting to prevent genocide) on the /possibility/ for genocide had been reached.

No, that is not what they said.

From: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c3g9g63jl17o

> The judges had stressed they did not need to say for now whether a genocide had occurred but concluded that some of the acts South Africa complained about, if they were proven, could fall under the United Nations’ Convention on Genocide.

Regarding Russia, the ICJ has already ruled:

From: https://www.icj-cij.org/sites/default/files/case-related/...

> The Russian Federation shall immediately suspend the military operations that it commenced on 24 February 2022 in the territory of Ukraine

Also, ICC(different court) has an arrest warrant out for Putin:

https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-ukraine-icc-judges...

But again, the issue at hand are the excluded developers, which of them, if any, should not have been excluded?