A false midnight
A false midnight
Posted Mar 12, 2014 19:47 UTC (Wed) by zuki (subscriber, #41808)In reply to: A false midnight by khim
Parent article: A false midnight
Posted Mar 12, 2014 20:12 UTC (Wed)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
Posted Mar 12, 2014 20:29 UTC (Wed)
by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Mar 13, 2014 0:56 UTC (Thu)
by zuki (subscriber, #41808)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Mar 13, 2014 4:33 UTC (Thu)
by dlang (guest, #313)
[Link]
how much stuff is there that will run on 2.7 that won't run on 3.3? I'm talking about stuff written for earlier 2.x versions that continues to run on 2.7, but won't run on 3.3.
Posted Mar 14, 2014 19:16 UTC (Fri)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Mar 15, 2014 12:58 UTC (Sat)
by edomaur (subscriber, #14520)
[Link]
A false midnight
Which has a lot less scope for pain (mostly, I suspect, relating to the behaviour of the optimizer) than upgrading from Python 2 to Python 3 does. gcc 3.4 supports ISO C90, ISO C99, and ISO C++98, and so does gcc 4.9. Version 3.4 of the Python interpreter does not support the version of the Python language supported by version 2.7 of the Python interpreter, and a quick look suggests that the available machine-translation approach is in the realms of "good, but definitely not fully reliable".
A false midnight
A false midnight
A false midnight
A false midnight
A false midnight
http://pythonhosted.org/six/#six.with_metaclass