Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Posted Apr 9, 2010 20:25 UTC (Fri) by Daiz (guest, #65138)In reply to: Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle by gmaxwell
Parent article: Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
On a theoretical level, yes, on actual technical level, no. In that aspect it's about on par with SRT, except a lot less supported.
>... and "mature support for encumbered codecs" is most of your feature list.
For your average user backing up their DVDs or encoding their shortfilms or doing whatever it is quite important, since more often than not these people want to get the best quality they can get, in which case for video they turn to x264, the best video encoder in the world.
My main argument against Ogg in the web is that it separates content to web and non-web. I'd rather have Theora+Vorbis in MKV than Theora+Vorbis in Ogg, though more preferrably I'd use H.264+Vorbis in MKV for my web video needs if HTML5 <video> supported that properly in major browsers. I'm quite sure many people would be delighted about this too, since it'd basically mean that their personal copy and the web copy can be the exact same file without compromising quality.
>I've never seen an MKV file using chapters myself
And I've seen thousands and made hundreds. Quite literally. And I gotta say that I love chapters. I backup plenty of TV series I own and with chapter support I can easily skip for example the opening and ending themes of a show. With segment linking, I can even have the opening and ending in separate files and seamlessly link them to the episode files, which saves space.
In general I hate how ignorant the whole media industry seems to be of subtitles. Subtitles in DVDs look atrocious, even Blu-ray subtitles are more limited than they could be, MP4's subtitle support is a joke... it seems like no-one in the industry cares at all, which isn't a surprise considering it's mostly based in the US where subtitles are a rarity. Around my part of the world everything that's not for very little kids and is in a foreign language is subtitled. This is the case in quite many countries, and for people living in those countries, subtitles matter as well. Subtitle support needs to be taken more seriously!
How about you Xiph guys rather spend your time trying to kill software patents completely? I bet you'd manage to get that done faster than improving Theora encoders to the point that they beat x264, and then we'd have no need to argue about whether something is patent encumbered or not anymore.
Posted Apr 9, 2010 21:34 UTC (Fri)
by xiphmont (guest, #58693)
[Link] (5 responses)
Hmm, OK, I see that concern. But I already need to do that in that I
> I'd rather have Theora+Vorbis in MKV
...but only if you don't have to pay for it! Ahhh.... somebody
> I'm quite sure many
The day that MPEG-LA renounces its h264 patents, I'll dance in
> How about you Xiph guys rather spend your time trying to kill
We'll get right on that.
> I bet you'd manage to get that done faster than improving Theora
Ah, so I was being trolled all along. Oh well.
Posted Apr 10, 2010 12:20 UTC (Sat)
by Daiz (guest, #65138)
[Link] (4 responses)
I wasn't trolling even one bit. Are you seriously implying that Xiph (or anyone else) could ever make libtheora beat x264 in speed and quality? If you are, get real. Honestly. That's just silly. Even if x264 development stopped completely right now, it still wouldn't ever happen.
Posted Apr 10, 2010 15:46 UTC (Sat)
by bronson (subscriber, #4806)
[Link] (3 responses)
> it still wouldn't ever happen.
Dude, ever is a very long time. Speaking of getting real...
Posted Apr 11, 2010 9:03 UTC (Sun)
by Daiz (guest, #65138)
[Link] (2 responses)
Also, as it is, x264 development is a lot more active than libtheora development is. From the beginning of 2009, Theora has received about 42 updates. In the same time, x264 has had 440 revisions.
The only way libtheora could ever beat x264 pretty much requires that software patents stop existing, and at that point we wouldn't even need it anymore.
Thus, libtheora will never beat x264 in quality in speed.
Posted Apr 11, 2010 10:03 UTC (Sun)
by gmaxwell (guest, #30048)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Apr 11, 2010 14:06 UTC (Sun)
by Daiz (guest, #65138)
[Link]
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
> content to web and non-web.
record and edit at high bitrate and have to reencode for reasonable web
rates anyway. I'm not going to stream at 25Mbit.
> than Theora+Vorbis in Ogg, though more preferrably I'd use
> H.264+Vorbis in MKV for my web video needs if HTML5 <video>
> supported that properly in major browsers.
does. Even in France.
> people would be delighted about this too, since it'd basically
> mean that their personal copy and the web copy can be the exact
> same file without compromising quality.
the streets. The argument will be over, and everyone including
99.99% of businesses will have won. But I expect that not only
will MPEG find a way to keep milking it way past 2028, but by
then the entire patent pool will be pushing its new thing and
you'll be here arguing that we're not right in the head for
thinking Ogg NextGen can stand up against h265, and h265 isn't
really that much money, and everyone is using h265 anyway and you
can put h265 in MKV and not Ogg so Ogg sucks.
> software patents completely?
> encoders to the point that they beat x264, and then we'd have no
> need to argue about whether something is patent encumbered or not
> anymore.
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle
Ogg and the multimedia container format struggle