I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
Posted Jan 29, 2025 18:32 UTC (Wed) by bluca (subscriber, #118303)In reply to: I feel entitlement-vibes by nix
Parent article: FOSDEM keynote causes concerns
In Scotland (sadly still part of the UK) I got the vaccine in a pharmacy just last month, so it should be possible, if you look around for one offering it. It should be easier of course
Posted Jan 30, 2025 10:42 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (10 responses)
That said, the covid vaccines do not prevent infection - past a few months. Also, essentially 100% of people are now vaccinated, multiple times over. Everyone alive - other than some babies and young children - has been exposed to and infected by covid multiple times now. Your immunity is as good as it's going to get really, modulo senescence.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 10:49 UTC (Thu)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link] (9 responses)
I am well aware of how the health service works in my country, thank you. Vaccine procurement, authorization, etc, is not devolved, and is largely dependent on the JCVI, so the only thing the SNHS can decide is whether to make them available for free or not and to whom, but private pharmacies can sell it (or not) to paying customers independently of it.
> Your immunity is as good as it's going to get really, modulo senescence.
This is illiterate nonsense. "Natural immunity" fades within months from the infection. Vaccines do not do great for infection prevention, but help MASSIVELY with lowering the severity of the illness if it is caught, and the likelihood of long-term effects such as long covid. Please stop spreading anti-vaxx nonsense on LWN, I'm sure you'll get plenty of "likes" from bots if you instead go do that on twitler or whatever it is called this week.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:04 UTC (Thu)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (3 responses)
In large parts of England they have elected not to -- the cost of doing so is too high, and it was literally driving pharmacies bankrupt (which you'd think would have made it obvious that there was a lot of demand...). So they almost all stopped. I think last I checked there were two left providing vaccinations in all of Cambridgeshire, both with huge backlogs.
> This is illiterate nonsense. "Natural immunity" fades within months from the infection.
There are two distinct things going on here. Antibody levels drop fast -- this is a *good thing* because if you had the immediate post-infection level of antibodies to every disease you ever caught your blood would be a thick soup at best. The level you get after antibody ramp-up is the level you need to drive out an *established disease*, not defeat a newly-landed one). Antibody levels are really easy to measure, so have got most of the attention.
What probably does not fade so fast is T cell recognition of viral antigens: T cells have a remarkably long life (it can be decades!) and remain receptive as long as they live -- but can be killed off by other things, can go nuts attacking some other disease they are also receptive to and get exhausted doing that, etc. But if they survive all that, they will probably protect you from getting actually killed by covid for a long, long time. Not always -- this is statistical -- but probably.
Neither of these things really kick in fast enough to prevent viruses that replicate in the respiratory tract from getting in there, replicating, then going straight back out to infect someone else. That sort of immunity is very hard to attain, which is why no covid vaccine to date prevents transmission, and why the common cold is so incredibly hard to stop.
But, y'know, it's not just getting killed I want to be protected from! I don't much want to land in bed for three weeks feeling like death either, like I did last time I got covid (let alone the two months of being too enervated to do much work). And *that* is helped by reducing exposure, by, say, getting people who might be infectious to wear masks, or just not going to FOSDEM.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:46 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (1 responses)
There is evidence that repeated exposure to the same antigen will lead to this system becoming very specifically trained to that antigen - "imprinting". With rapidly evolving pathogens, with rapidly varying antigens, this is not per se a benefit.
E.g., (and without making a specific point about any particular disease), repeated immunisation with a vaccine that contains (or causes the manufacture of) 1 specific, unchanged, antigenic protein of a pathogen, is likely to lead to a population of B cells with a stronger bias towards that antigenic protein (kind of like doing ML with a large data-set except it's strongly biased to one feature). Yet, if that pathogen evolves rapidly in the wild it is likely to lead to mutations in that antigenic protein so as to evade those immune responses trained to that old version of that protein.
It is probably better to train your immune system with a /spectrum/ of antigens. Not just 1 protein from 1 version of a pathogen that was in the wild 3+ years ago (and has evolved numerous new, slightly different, lineages since). The literature suggests this is the case across a number of diseases, where we have some data on repeat exposure to unchanged v evolved antigens (be they from vaccinations or infection). That is NOT to say there is no value in immunisation by vaccination! But it does suggest there may be /diminishing/ value - even sometimes negative value - in repeated vaccination with old antigens (in the general sense). There is /some/ evidence in the literature this may be the case for ever-repeating covid19 vaccinations (all in the west present a subunit protein of the spike, with a very infrequently updated version of it). In tandem with vaccinations, we all are anyway - unavoidably - exposed to the full pathogen, through minor infections, when it comes to highly infectious respiratory pathogens such as SARS-CoV-2, so we will still get that wide exposure.
Then there are also T-cells, which directly kill pathogens, and also help mediate B-cell evolution. Some will last you pretty much a lifetime, as you say.
Things here are fascinatingly complex. There are many systems and interactions. There are trade-offs. Sadly, clever people on both sides prioritise politics over educating themselves and reading actual scientific information - instead getting their knowledge largely from popular political media, which is nearly always laughably simplified to point of just being incorrect - and that's true be it "Colbert" or "Fox News".
There is far too much knee-jerk idiocy on /both/ sides.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:56 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
Complexity. Trade-offs. They abound.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 12:04 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
There is /some/ evidence that nasal spray vaccinations have a degree of better efficacy for preventing covid infection than injected vaccinations. There are many different kinds of T-cells, and 1 variant is specific to the mucosa - a kind of front-line of defence, at the point of entry for respiratory infections. Nasal spray vaccines appear to stimulate immune responses in those mucosal cells a little bit better than muscular injections.
Been a while since I read into this though, and the evidence base was still preliminary and weak/suggestive at that point. I have not followed evidence since, and I do not know if stronger evidence now exists and if so whether it confirms or contradicts the earlier. (I don't think nasal spray covid vaccinations are widely used yet (??), in which case there is unlikely to be any strong evidence yet either).
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:05 UTC (Thu)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
You mentioned "natural immunity", not I. Vaccine immunity fares no better (it physiologically can not do better, for obvious reasons). Your rant there is completely off and disconnected from the body of published evidence - your illiteracy claim has the sense misplaced, if anything. But.. .that's not for LWN.
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:08 UTC (Thu)
by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
[Link] (1 responses)
… unless you continue to be exposed to low-level background viral load. Granted that this probably is not the case for most of the troglodytes who only leave their cave once a year, for FOSDEM. :-P
> Vaccines do not do great for infection prevention,
Depends on the vaccine. They did super with smallpox (and would do the same with measles if it wasn't for the conspiracy nutcases).
Posted Jan 30, 2025 11:30 UTC (Thu)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link]
Yeah totally, was talking about the covid ones exclusively
Posted Jan 30, 2025 14:24 UTC (Thu)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (1 responses)
> This is illiterate nonsense. "Natural immunity" fades within months from the infection.
And that's ill-informed arrogance.
The reason the common cold (AND CoVid!) is usually harmless is because it is so common. It comes round every few months in a slightly new variant and re-infects you. And because your body remembers the old variant it fights the new one off with ease. So your natural immunity IS as close to perfect as it can get. The virus is constantly changing, your immunity is constantly changing, there's a balance that shifts back and forth.
HINT: Even when CoVid was brand new, one of the factors that helped it spread so fast, was because the MAJORITY of victims did not know they'd been infected. It was just the unfortunate older people who got hit so hard because it was too different from anything they'd ever met before.
Cheers,
Wol
Posted Jan 30, 2025 14:33 UTC (Thu)
by jzb (editor, #7867)
[Link]
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes
I feel entitlement-vibes