OSDL: AIO-Stress summary for AIO patch set vs linux-2.6.8
From: | Judith Lebzelter <judith@osdl.org> | |
To: | <suparna@in.ibm.com> | |
Subject: | OSDL: AIO-Stress summary for AIO patch set vs linux-2.6.8 | |
Date: | Fri, 27 Aug 2004 16:16:43 -0700 (PDT) | |
Cc: | <linux-aio@kvack.org>, <mason@suse.com>, <linux-osdl@osdl.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org> |
Hello; I have done a summary of some aio-stress runs on our 1CPU and 2CPU hosts to compare the performance of the latest version of Suparna's buffered AIO patch set http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-aio&m=109285137... (less the aio-ra) to the linux-2.6.8 kernel. I found up to a 442% improvement and was wondering if anyone could explain it. The buffered results on 1CPU/single disk/512M RAM/1 2G File showed: Sequential Reads: -13.2% Random reads: +32.7% The buffered results on 2CPU/5 Disk striped Megaraid/1G RAM/1 4G File showed: Sequential reads: +2.1% Random Reads: +442% The improvement in buffered random reads from this patch set was +32% on 1CPU and +442% on 2CPU. This was more than expected on the 2CPU host at +442%. It seems as though the 'buffered random reads' performance on the unpatched linux-2.6.8 kernel is unexpectedly low at only 7.57MB/s on our 5 Disk striped Megaraid partition. The buffered sequential reads on the 1CPU host were 13% slower, but they did not change significantly on the 2CPU host. There were no other serious regressions or changes within error. The full summary is at: http://developer.osdl.org/judith/aio/result_compare_2.6.8... Regards; Judith Lebzelter OSDL - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/