Do they even see themselves how utterly ridiculous they are?

> We also have some non-goals:
> * Don’t worry about when or if today’s giant companies will join Post Open. The answer to "When will IBM come on board" may well be "never", because for such a large company, participation would mean a new USD$60 Million dollar per year fee (1% of USD$6 Billion). Instead, attract small and new companies with a free license, and grow them into paid license customers.
(https://postopen.org/how-post-open-works/)

...but I think those numbers are wrong - IBM's annual revenue is more like $60B, so the fee would be $600M per year. ($6B is IBM's recent annual net income, or their quarterly revenue from "software" alone (excluding "consulting", "infrastructure", etc))

And IBM isn't even a very big company by revenue (219th according to https://fortune.com/ranking/global500/ - the top companies are 10x higher), and it gets a higher proportion of its value from open source software than most companies, and it has reasonably decent net profit margins (~10%, compared to e.g Walmart's 2% which is typical for the grocery industry, meaning this fee would be half of Walmart's entire profits), so IBM is one of the better cases for this licence.

I think the non-goal is effectively excluding all companies in low-profit-margin industries, and most large-ish companies in high-profit-margin industries, and any small/medium company which hopes to either grow into a large-ish company or be acquired by one. So I find it hard to imagine _any_ company would ever agree to this. And without buy-in from companies totalling probably billions of dollars in revenue, there won't be enough money to fund the project.