Ignoring undefined behaviour

Posted Nov 1, 2024 9:22 UTC (Fri) by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
In reply to: Ignoring undefined behaviour by anton
Parent article: realloc() and the oversize importance of zero-size objects

> It is unlikely that one or a few volunteers can change the course of these big projects in a way that conflicts with the value system of the paid participants.

FWIW, LLVM has a (new) community code ownership policy[1] and is actively seeking[2] community members to participate. You're unlikely to change minds if you conflict about something from the paying entities, but it is possible to offer arguments[3] that end up nudging things in the right direction[4] (even if there's a lack of explicit acknowledgement).

[1] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/rfc-proposing-changes-to-the...
[2] https://discourse.llvm.org/t/calling-all-volunteers/82817
[3] https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/pull/19940#issuecomme...
[4] https://github.com/bazelbuild/bazel/pull/19940#issuecomme...