|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A backdoor in xz

A backdoor in xz

Posted Apr 1, 2024 9:39 UTC (Mon) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: A backdoor in xz by ras
Parent article: A backdoor in xz

> However, a git repository and git commits aren't in my opinion source code.

Source code is defined as the preferred format to use when you want to work on the code in question. I submit that these days the number of upstream authors of nontrivial packages whose workflow consist of "while buggy: edit compile debug", followed by "edit version# && make clean && tar cfz && upload", is essentially zero.

Thus it seems like a good idea to use the code that's actually checked into upstream's version control as a basis for automated building of a distribution's binaries *and* the sources it needs to provide, for copyleft-right-and-center reasons if nothing else. Instead of ignoring upstream's git archive and basing the build on some unsigned tarball somebody created somehow.

Mostly-seamless conversion from upstream-plus-patches to Debian-branch-of-git-archive and back is pretty straightforward these days, thanks to dgit and related tools.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds