|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A backdoor in xz

A backdoor in xz

Posted Mar 30, 2024 15:27 UTC (Sat) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)
In reply to: A backdoor in xz by bluca
Parent article: A backdoor in xz

I understand the advantages of the dlopen approach, but it still leaves me feeling uneasy. You might get shared libraries that you don't expect dlopened just by making an innocent API call.

It seems to me that the supervisor notification protocol is likely to be used by many programs, and also quite likely that they might not want anything else from libsystemd. Wouldn't it make sense to put the notification client code in its own shared library that has no external dependencies and won't dlopen anything else ever?


to post comments

A backdoor in xz

Posted Mar 30, 2024 15:52 UTC (Sat) by zdzichu (subscriber, #17118) [Link]

Funny, it was this way until v209 in 2014. sd-daemon was a collection of functions like sd_notify() and so on, it got merged into libsystemd then.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds