A backdoor in xz
A backdoor in xz
Posted Mar 30, 2024 15:27 UTC (Sat) by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)In reply to: A backdoor in xz by bluca
Parent article: A backdoor in xz
I understand the advantages of the dlopen approach, but it still leaves me feeling uneasy. You might get shared libraries that you don't expect dlopened just by making an innocent API call.
It seems to me that the supervisor notification protocol is likely to be used by many programs, and also quite likely that they might not want anything else from libsystemd. Wouldn't it make sense to put the notification client code in its own shared library that has no external dependencies and won't dlopen anything else ever?
Posted Mar 30, 2024 15:52 UTC (Sat)
by zdzichu (subscriber, #17118)
[Link]
A backdoor in xz