A backdoor in xz
A backdoor in xz
Posted Mar 30, 2024 13:58 UTC (Sat) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935)In reply to: A backdoor in xz by bluca
Parent article: A backdoor in xz
Posted Mar 31, 2024 12:17 UTC (Sun)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link] (4 responses)
The manager <-> service protocol is trivial, so the solution is to just reimplement it if that's all you need. I'll check whether we have some MIT-0 copy-paste ready examples, and if not add it to the documentation.
Posted Apr 1, 2024 5:31 UTC (Mon)
by mchapman (subscriber, #66589)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Apr 1, 2024 11:02 UTC (Mon)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Apr 2, 2024 17:16 UTC (Tue)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link]
Posted Apr 2, 2024 20:40 UTC (Tue)
by himi (subscriber, #340)
[Link]
A backdoor in xz
systemd used to provide a reference implementation (+ header). Perhaps something like this could be brought back?
A backdoor in xz
A backdoor in xz
A backdoor in xz
A backdoor in xz