|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A turning point for CVE numbers

A turning point for CVE numbers

Posted Mar 7, 2024 5:58 UTC (Thu) by DemiMarie (subscriber, #164188)
In reply to: A turning point for CVE numbers by bluca
Parent article: A turning point for CVE numbers

Why is a kernel upgrade disruptive? That seems like an indication that the application doesn’t have proper clustering support. Obviously, that’s quite possible, but my understanding is that best practice nowadays is to ensure that rebooting a server is just not a bug deal.

There are obviously many exceptions to this (HPC and embedded systems come to mind), but this seems to be the general rule. As far as stable kernel releases breaking stuff, is that something that should be caught in testing, preferable before the new stable tree is released?


to post comments

A turning point for CVE numbers

Posted Mar 13, 2024 12:45 UTC (Wed) by ju3Ceemi (subscriber, #102464) [Link]

You are correct : kernel upgrades on a sane system is not disruptive

When I need it, I just reboot the boxes (one by one, unless monitoring cries)

"If you cannot handle maintenances, you cannot handle incidents"


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds