A turning point for CVE numbers
A turning point for CVE numbers
Posted Feb 16, 2024 14:09 UTC (Fri) by bluca (subscriber, #118303)In reply to: A turning point for CVE numbers by pizza
Parent article: A turning point for CVE numbers
Sounds like a problem in that company then, why should that justify breaking everything for everybody else?
> Respectfully, you need to STFU about stuff that is outside your realm of expertise and experience.
Respectfully, you need to STFU about my expertise and experience, because you have no idea about either (just like I don't about yours)
Posted Feb 16, 2024 15:32 UTC (Fri)
by pizza (subscriber, #46)
[Link]
*shrug* You made an assertion such organizations do not exist (because you didn't know any) and used that to accuse others of making things up or otherwise speaking in bad faith. You were incorrect on both fronts.
You're free to argue that the current status quo has problems (or not). You're free to talk about *your* experiences, and how proposed actions by others will have ill effects on you or third parties.
But you don't get to claim that other people's direct experiences are wrong, incorrect, or irrelevant, and accuse them of bad faith for taking steps to improve the messes they are dealing with, "because you have no idea about either".
Posted Feb 16, 2024 15:49 UTC (Fri)
by pizza (subscriber, #46)
[Link]
Incidently, that company was that way because *EU regulations required them to be*.
(They laid off my research team on the tail end of a major process/policy revamp brought about by new regulations soon to come into effect. I was made to endure many training sessions about how those new/updated regulations affected every part of the overall product lifecycle, from early design to manufacturing to label placement/content to post-sales support to how end-of-life would be handled)
So it's not "that company's problem" so much as "the problem of any company operating in a regulated space"
A turning point for CVE numbers
A turning point for CVE numbers