A GNU COBOL status update
A GNU COBOL status update
Posted Nov 15, 2023 17:38 UTC (Wed) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)In reply to: A GNU COBOL status update by Flameeyes
Parent article: A GNU COBOL status update
That language cannot be too many decades in the past, IMHO.
Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:05 UTC (Wed)
by Flameeyes (guest, #51238)
[Link] (3 responses)
I'm in no sarcastic way not understanding what the connection would be between turning back clocks and COBOL.
Unless *everything* to do with computer goes back to COBOL in the mind of the author which could be understandable, but would worry me nonetheless.
Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:08 UTC (Wed)
by willy (subscriber, #9762)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:29 UTC (Wed)
by Flameeyes (guest, #51238)
[Link] (1 responses)
Okay I wouldn't have made that particular leap. Thanks!
Posted Nov 18, 2023 7:50 UTC (Sat)
by ssmith32 (subscriber, #72404)
[Link]
A GNU COBOL status update
A GNU COBOL status update
A GNU COBOL status update
A GNU COBOL status update