|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

A GNU COBOL status update

A GNU COBOL status update

Posted Nov 15, 2023 17:38 UTC (Wed) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: A GNU COBOL status update by Flameeyes
Parent article: A GNU COBOL status update

What's "Wut" about that? When you're talking about computers there's "turning back the clocks", and then there's COBOL.

That language cannot be too many decades in the past, IMHO.


to post comments

A GNU COBOL status update

Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:05 UTC (Wed) by Flameeyes (guest, #51238) [Link] (3 responses)

Am I to assume this is a type of in-joke that is going to be totally obtuse to anyone under 40? (50? 60?)

I'm in no sarcastic way not understanding what the connection would be between turning back clocks and COBOL.

Unless *everything* to do with computer goes back to COBOL in the mind of the author which could be understandable, but would worry me nonetheless.

A GNU COBOL status update

Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:08 UTC (Wed) by willy (subscriber, #9762) [Link] (2 responses)

Turning back the clocks -> going back in time -> working on a dead language

A GNU COBOL status update

Posted Nov 15, 2023 18:29 UTC (Wed) by Flameeyes (guest, #51238) [Link] (1 responses)

🤦

Okay I wouldn't have made that particular leap. Thanks!

A GNU COBOL status update

Posted Nov 18, 2023 7:50 UTC (Sat) by ssmith32 (subscriber, #72404) [Link]

If it makes you feel better, I thought it was a reference to Y2K, and all the hemming and hawing about COBOL programs not handling time (and say, quirky things like DST) very well.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds