The push to save Itanium
The push to save Itanium
Posted Nov 10, 2023 18:22 UTC (Fri) by intelfx (subscriber, #130118)In reply to: The push to save Itanium by thoeme
Parent article: The push to save Itanium
You might not need (nor want) new kernels per se, but you might reasonably want a modern userspace, and ince, say, systemd or docker or whatever starts requiring $NEXT_BIG_THING (like it was with cgroup2), you may suddenly find yourself out of luck.
Posted Nov 11, 2023 1:12 UTC (Sat)
by WolfWings (subscriber, #56790)
[Link] (1 responses)
At this point the upcoming Raspberry Pi 5 will outperform all but the final last-gasp 8-core-16-thread Itanium CPUs from what benchmarks I've been able to dig up.
It's an INCREDIBLY dead platform because it's just so atrocious from the base fundamental design all the way up to the software (non-)support. It's as dead as the Bulldozer variants from AMD were compared to previous and later models, it just has no benefits at all versus many other options.
Posted Nov 16, 2023 8:58 UTC (Thu)
by anton (subscriber, #25547)
[Link]
I don't know if that is the motivation of those who want to keep IA-64 in the kernel and glibc, though.
Posted Nov 12, 2023 9:35 UTC (Sun)
by pm215 (subscriber, #98099)
[Link]
The push to save Itanium
We have all kinds of outdated hardware (including an IA-64 box) in order to do comparisons between hardware across the ages. In my case I compare them using software written in C that does not use modern glibc features, so I don't need a modern userland and thus not a modern kernel (so our IA-64 actually has some ancient system), but others with a similar motivation may need an up-to-date userland.
The push to save Itanium
The push to save Itanium