|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Chamberlain v. Home Assistant

Chamberlain v. Home Assistant

Posted Nov 10, 2023 8:24 UTC (Fri) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)
In reply to: Chamberlain v. Home Assistant by oldtomas
Parent article: Chamberlain v. Home Assistant

> There's another premium: Tesla. They milk every sliver of data they can from you.

You can opt out. The car works quite well without connectivity, entirely unlike the cloud-mandatory and app-only nonsense certain other companies require for a goddamn light bulb. Or, in this case, a garage door.

> Valuable data to train autonomous car algos.

So? if you don't want to share your data, turn that off.

Granted that Tesla could be somewhat more transparent WRT their data use. On the other hand, the cars do have an API which, while neither cloud-free(*) nor documented officially, is stable enough to support several third-party solutions, Home Assistant included. They don't lock anybody out, and until they do (which IMHO they won't) they're not the bad guys in the context of this article.

* don't know about you, but my garage doesn't have WIFI …


to post comments

Chamberlain v. Home Assistant

Posted Nov 12, 2023 8:55 UTC (Sun) by oldtomas (guest, #72579) [Link]

Me? My WiFi has no garage...


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds