Rust code review and netdev

Posted Nov 3, 2023 2:54 UTC (Fri) by jschrod (subscriber, #1646)
In reply to: Rust code review and netdev by atnot
Parent article: Rust code review and netdev

Well, may it be -- that outside the kernel community not many projects need that variety?

Forge-based workflows are good for centraly-controlled developments.
But that won't work for the extremely decentralized development of the Linux kernel.

Do you really think that a forge-based workflow would work in *all* of the Linux kernel subcomunities?

Frankly, then you would have to present more detailled ideas to support your point of view.

Rust code review and netdev

Posted Nov 4, 2023 10:35 UTC (Sat) by snajpa (subscriber, #73467) [Link] (1 responses)

yes, it would, but not with a bunch of high-profile people in the project who are already committed to the idea that it ever won't, then it just won't

Rust code review and netdev

Posted Nov 4, 2023 10:52 UTC (Sat) by snajpa (subscriber, #73467) [Link]

IMHO "the DRM subsys" is the only rationale that anyone should ever need these days, just go and click around there, then compare to the pure LKML experience - and then imagine if we only had this forge experience and no mailing lists fragmentation at all... IMHO a no brainer, but how do you argument sanely with people who get a panic attack from the idea that they should open their browser and enable javascript...