|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Rethinking multi-grain timestamps

Rethinking multi-grain timestamps

Posted Oct 10, 2023 12:33 UTC (Tue) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
In reply to: Rethinking multi-grain timestamps by NYKevin
Parent article: Rethinking multi-grain timestamps

> you can and should just pick your favorite reference frame, and use Lorentz transformations to correct all observations in other frames to match it.

I'm thinking humans here. And stock markets. Where $billions could hang on the precise ordering of events. :-)

And yes, I know that in our macro world all reference frames are - to all intents and purposes - the same. But as soon as you say "pick your favourite frame", you're going to get people fighting for the one that is to their personal advantage.

Which is my point. As clocks get faster (the point of this article) and distances get greater (we're talking about a network), the greater the importance of the chosen reference frame, which is a matter of politics not maths. Which means we cannot appeal to logic for a solution.

Cheers,
Wol


to post comments

Rethinking multi-grain timestamps

Posted Oct 10, 2023 16:11 UTC (Tue) by wittenberg (subscriber, #4473) [Link]

At this point, you need some old guy to point out the definitive discussion of this: Time, Clocks, and the Ordering of Events in a Distributed System
https://lamport.azurewebsites.net/pubs/time-clocks.pdf (1978) by Leslie Lamport. As you would expect from him, it's beautifully written. Everybody concerned with this issue should read it.

--David


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds