Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Either way, the vulnerabilities are now disclosed, but patches are not yet
on offer; Schlittermann said that "Fixes are available in a protected
repository and are ready to be applied by the distribution
maintainers
", so hopefully that situation will change soon.
Posted Sep 30, 2023 14:47 UTC (Sat)
by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)
[Link] (8 responses)
Exim does not have a great track record. I know it'd be an enormous change, but I think it's time for Debian to switch to Postfix as its default MTA.
Posted Sep 30, 2023 15:54 UTC (Sat)
by lordsutch (guest, #53)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 30, 2023 16:48 UTC (Sat)
by dskoll (subscriber, #1630)
[Link]
Right. It's very easy to switch to Postfix, and of course an upgrade should keep the existing MTA.
I'm just saying that a switch like this would likely be a big deal for Debian given their cautious decision-making process.
Posted Sep 30, 2023 20:38 UTC (Sat)
by jond (subscriber, #37669)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 30, 2023 22:06 UTC (Sat)
by Karellen (subscriber, #67644)
[Link]
Posted Sep 30, 2023 20:58 UTC (Sat)
by cmeerw (guest, #555)
[Link] (2 responses)
(btw, postfix might not even implement the functionality that's affected by these vulnerabilities)
Posted Oct 1, 2023 17:33 UTC (Sun)
by cmeerw (guest, #555)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Oct 1, 2023 19:55 UTC (Sun)
by pharm (guest, #22305)
[Link]
So long as your DNS resolver is sane, you’re OK it seems.
Posted Oct 13, 2023 7:34 UTC (Fri)
by tsr2 (subscriber, #4293)
[Link]
Posted Sep 30, 2023 22:03 UTC (Sat)
by pharm (guest, #22305)
[Link] (4 responses)
Posted Sep 30, 2023 22:07 UTC (Sat)
by pharm (guest, #22305)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Oct 2, 2023 10:53 UTC (Mon)
by james (subscriber, #1325)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Oct 2, 2023 13:04 UTC (Mon)
by pharm (guest, #22305)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Oct 2, 2023 13:35 UTC (Mon)
by james (subscriber, #1325)
[Link]
I'm running 4.96.1 now, and it seems to work on a not-very-heavily-used mailserver.
Posted Oct 1, 2023 19:27 UTC (Sun)
by ametlwn (subscriber, #10544)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Oct 1, 2023 23:18 UTC (Sun)
by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)
[Link]
Posted Oct 3, 2023 18:08 UTC (Tue)
by Trelane (subscriber, #56877)
[Link]
Posted Oct 16, 2023 6:09 UTC (Mon)
by IanKelling (subscriber, #89418)
[Link]
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
I think the mail-server/task-mail-server task went away a release or two ago. But exim4-daemon-light and exim4-daemon-heavy both provide the virtual package name default-mta along with mail-transport-agent, while other MTAs (like postfix) only provide mail-transport-agent. Then packages that require a mail server (e.g. bsd-mailx) generally depend on default-mta | mail-transport-agent.
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
We go public with the available fixes (addressing a subset of
the issues) on Monday, Oct 2nd, 12:00 UTC.
Heiko Schlittermann
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
FWIW, I'm not Heiko: I just quoted him.
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2023/10/01/4
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
Multiple Exim security vulnerabilities disclosed
