The European Cyber Resilience Act
The European Cyber Resilience Act
Posted Sep 20, 2023 14:05 UTC (Wed) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)In reply to: The European Cyber Resilience Act by paulj
Parent article: The European Cyber Resilience Act
I was thinking of the case where requirements collide.
Actually, I think I can now word it far better. The GPL places requirements on the GIVER. The law places restrictions on the RECIPIENT. Where this is the case there can be no GPL violation. And, in this particular case, I think this is the actual state of affairs.
Americans are free to distribute GPL software into Europe, CRA or no CRA. If it's not been advertised in Europe then there is no "placed on the market", and it's a grey import.
Europeans are then free to distribute it, provided they comply with the extra legal burden of the CRA. And the GPL has no say here, because the "additional requirement" of complying with the CRA is not being passed on by the giver, but is imposed (or not) by the law.
Cheers,
Wol
Posted Sep 20, 2023 14:23 UTC (Wed)
by pizza (subscriber, #46)
[Link] (1 responses)
As currently drafted, simply being *made available* (even for zero cost) to an EU citizen is sufficient to be considered "placed on the market" for purposes of the CRA.
When the various proposed changes are reconciled together, we shall see what the new text says... But until then...
Posted Sep 20, 2023 15:26 UTC (Wed)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
Hmmm ... that's scary.
Because as I understand it, "placed on the market" is a term of art defined elsewhere in other (consumer protection?) legislation, and if the CRA is re-defining it, then that is a massive change - far bigger than just cyber-security and what-not.
Cheers,
The European Cyber Resilience Act
The European Cyber Resilience Act
Wol