Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Posted Sep 1, 2023 18:28 UTC (Fri) by bluca (subscriber, #118303)In reply to: Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library by mb
Parent article: Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Posted Sep 1, 2023 20:32 UTC (Fri)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Sep 1, 2023 20:36 UTC (Fri)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link]
Posted Sep 2, 2023 1:10 UTC (Sat)
by josh (subscriber, #17465)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Sep 2, 2023 1:38 UTC (Sat)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Sep 5, 2023 12:05 UTC (Tue)
by hmh (subscriber, #3838)
[Link] (1 responses)
While it looks at first glance that it would be "easy" to write one, that's for someone already used to working in that area of the kernel -- there are likely permission checks one need to get perfectly right to not create a security mishap, namespace concerns, etc. Experience in the specific area of the kernel you're working with almost always help a lot on the quality of the first public version of a patch, and faster acceptance in mainline for non-controversial changes.
Posted Sep 5, 2023 12:29 UTC (Tue)
by bluca (subscriber, #118303)
[Link]
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library
Race-free process creation in the GNU C Library