The OpenSprinkler controller
The OpenSprinkler controller
Posted Aug 30, 2023 14:21 UTC (Wed) by mb (subscriber, #50428)In reply to: The OpenSprinkler controller by Wol
Parent article: The OpenSprinkler controller
It's the users responsibility to not do stupid things.
Posted Aug 30, 2023 15:00 UTC (Wed)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (1 responses)
Cheers,
Posted Aug 30, 2023 15:17 UTC (Wed)
by mb (subscriber, #50428)
[Link]
No, I'm not. Quite contrary.
And while I agree that things should be secure by default in an ideal world, I don't think "insecure" things are bad per se.
If a user connects something to the internet, it's their responsibility to check if it's safe and secure. Just like it's their responsibility to check if it's safe and secure to leave the car doors open.
The OpenSprinkler controller
Wol
The OpenSprinkler controller
Users do stupid things all the time.
If I don't expose this to the internet, I don't see why I would strictly need authentication or anything like that. Plain old unencrypted and unauthenticated HTTP is just fine for many use cases. I do actually run such things (not this one, but similar things) inside of my secured network. And I really don't see the problem.
But that doesn't affect all other use cases and doesn't make the product any worse.