|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Much ado about SBAT

Much ado about SBAT

Posted Jul 23, 2023 21:03 UTC (Sun) by danielthompson (subscriber, #97243)
In reply to: Much ado about SBAT by bluca
Parent article: Much ado about SBAT

Where does the busy work come from?

"the revocation would have to be incremented" means updating the minimum accepted generation number (revoking everything older than *this* number), right? If so, there is no good reason to update the minimum accepted generation number simply because an upstream component increases a time-based generation number.


to post comments


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds