AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change
AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change
Posted Jun 26, 2023 9:46 UTC (Mon) by pbonzini (subscriber, #60935)In reply to: AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change by paulj
Parent article: AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change
Besides, what if I was just a random guy in Nebraska, I died the day after GitHub banned me, and none of my heirs knows what source is, what a forge is and why you put a dollar sign in there. Should they risk being sued for three years?
Posted Jun 26, 2023 14:04 UTC (Mon)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link] (1 responses)
https://lwn.net/Articles/936004/
The condition in that licence is:
" Make the Source Code of all Your Deployed Modifications publicly
There is no requirement in that to make the source and binary be distributed from same place. Or even that that the place of distribution must remain unchanged over the period.
Posted Jun 26, 2023 14:08 UTC (Mon)
by paulj (subscriber, #341)
[Link]
AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change
available under the terms of this License, for as long as you Deploy
the Covered Software or twenty-four (24) months from the date of
initial Deployment, whichever is longer; through a common and
customary form of distribution for source code (e.g. download from
a web site as a 'tar' archive, or via source-control-mechanism such
as git or hg).
"
AlmaLinux's response to Red Hat's policy change