Memory-management changes for CXL

Posted May 23, 2023 0:50 UTC (Tue) by balbir_singh (subscriber, #34142)
In reply to: Memory-management changes for CXL by joseph.h.garvin
Parent article: Memory-management changes for CXL

I would encourage Kim to look at https://lwn.net/Articles/713035/ and https://lwn.net/Articles/720380/. We've tried this in the past, but were held back due to HMM at that time. The idea of using a new MMAP is a bit too open, using madvise() and mempolicy() as alternatives might be better suited.