The Python Software Foundation on European cybersecurity

I'm not so sure. My impression is more that they are doing things in a way that abides by the letter of the law but still applies as much psychology as possible to increase the chances of you just hitting the "Agree to all" button, which is what the operator would generally like, instead of unchecking any of the unnecessary stuff. Just a few observations:

1, When you first visit, they pop up some box where you must agree to *something* before being able to use the site. There is seldom a button saying "I don't allow anything" (I have mostly seen such an option only on government run sites, but there are some others).
2, The button saying "I agree to everything" is always the single most prominent. So much so that the "configure/choose" option often masquerades as an inconspicuous tiny hyperlink.
3, When/if you get to the configure window there are usually 10-30 individual options to uncheck. Again, seldom is a "nothing" option available. This takes a while and is a pain in the ass. In an extreme case I have witnessed 30+ options, each of which took you to some site where you had to click to disable and then again to confirm it. Quite un-user friendly.
4, In the selection window the "Confirm Choices" button is *never* where you would usually expect it. Instead that location is prominently occupied by a "Agree to all" button.
5, If you decide to take the pain of deselecting something a few weeks later the website makes you go through the same dance. Strange that when clicking the "Agree to everything" button you never get reminded again.

This is why any legislation that allows "voluntary consent" simply changes the game, as it were, such that the bigger party tries as hard as they can to make you "voluntarily consent". Usually it is successful.