Some development statistics for 6.2
Some development statistics for 6.2
Posted Feb 22, 2023 15:35 UTC (Wed) by Nikratio (subscriber, #71966)Parent article: Some development statistics for 6.2
If for a given kernel there's hundreds of new first-time contributors, what happens to them afterwards?
The overall number of contributors does not seem to be changing that much. So are the new contributors replacing older contributors, or do they never come back after the first patch?
Posted Feb 22, 2023 16:00 UTC (Wed)
by corbet (editor, #1)
[Link] (3 responses)
Meanwhile, I have at times looked at lost contributors — those who contributed to a given release for the last time. The problem is that such a signal is necessarily old; we do get people who show up every few years to fix something that bothers them. You can never really say that somebody is gone.
Posted Feb 22, 2023 16:45 UTC (Wed)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
Dunno how far you want to go back, but maybe multiply the "contributors to the current kernel" by say 4, and then provide stats for the most prolific "contributed to X kernels" contributors up to that number.
Yes that will lose the "drive by" contributors, but it'll give an insight into the "now and then" contributors. Ten years is probably a good time window.
Cheers,
Posted Feb 24, 2023 9:15 UTC (Fri)
by Nikratio (subscriber, #71966)
[Link]
Another interesting thing may be to plot a histogram of current developers vs number of past kernels they have contributed to. This would tell us more about how much of the kernel comes from regular contributors vs occasional ones.
Posted Feb 27, 2023 16:46 UTC (Mon)
by sima (subscriber, #160698)
[Link]
Still a pile of scripting work to generate those numbers ...
The number of contributors to each release does continue to grow.
What happens to new contributors
What happens to new contributors
Wol
What happens to new contributors
What happens to new contributors
