Fedora's tempest in a stack frame
Fedora's tempest in a stack frame
Posted Jan 18, 2023 23:48 UTC (Wed) by pizza (subscriber, #46)In reply to: Fedora's tempest in a stack frame by intgr
Parent article: Fedora's tempest in a stack frame
I'm looking forward to finding out who's correct here.
Speaking personally, being able to do system-wide (ie not just single-application) profiling is worth a slight overall performance hit. Because currently it is effectively impossible to do so (at least for anything non-trivial)
Posted Jan 19, 2023 0:15 UTC (Thu)
by mcatanzaro (subscriber, #93033)
[Link] (1 responses)
Hopefully. ;)
Like Brendan said, "once you find a 500% perf win you have a different perspective about the <1% cost." Well the cost may be a little higher than 1%, but point remains.
Posted Jan 19, 2023 4:50 UTC (Thu)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link]
Thank you. Who cares about a 2% hit on software that runs 0.001% of the time = the vast majority of software. Performance is ALL about bottlenecks and critical sections. Which you can't do anything about if you don't even know where they are.
Posted Jan 20, 2023 7:58 UTC (Fri)
by mgedmin (subscriber, #34497)
[Link]
Sadly I use Ubuntu, so Fedora's decision won't help me directly. It does make it somewhat more tempting to switch distros.
Fedora's tempest in a stack frame
Fedora's tempest in a stack frame
Fedora's tempest in a stack frame