Packaging Rust for Fedora
Packaging Rust for Fedora
Posted Oct 31, 2022 6:12 UTC (Mon) by ceplm (subscriber, #41334)In reply to: Packaging Rust for Fedora by ssokolow
Parent article: Packaging Rust for Fedora
Posted Oct 31, 2022 7:43 UTC (Mon)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (4 responses)
And before it was a ton of unmaintained crap smeared over RHEL servers with who-knows-what custom configs hidden inside /var/share/somewhere/etc/why/thefuck/its/here, all placed there by a "user-friendly" installer script. I wish I were exaggerating.
At least Docker images are a step up because the Docker files list the commands needed to build the image.
There's no solution to unmaintained old software except making maintenance easier.
Posted Oct 31, 2022 18:15 UTC (Mon)
by Conan_Kudo (subscriber, #103240)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Oct 31, 2022 18:35 UTC (Mon)
by khim (subscriber, #9252)
[Link] (1 responses)
How is that different from what any other industry faces?
Posted Oct 31, 2022 18:41 UTC (Mon)
by Conan_Kudo (subscriber, #103240)
[Link]
Posted Oct 31, 2022 19:53 UTC (Mon)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
It's not perfect, of course, but it's strictly better than the status quo ante. Even if not by a lot.
Packaging Rust for Fedora
You assume that the Dockerfiles exist. I have many-an-unmaintained image with no Dockerfile. There's no rebuilding or fixing this. You have to do the same kind of reverse engineering you did for unmaintained VMs or physical servers.
Packaging Rust for Fedora
Packaging Rust for Fedora
It isn't. I'm saying that container appliances are just as screwed as VM appliances.
Packaging Rust for Fedora
Packaging Rust for Fedora