A fuzzy issue of responsible disclosure

Posted Aug 19, 2022 15:46 UTC (Fri) by flussence (guest, #85566)
In reply to: A fuzzy issue of responsible disclosure by mcatanzaro
Parent article: A fuzzy issue of responsible disclosure

> It's OK to fail to mount a corrupted image. It's not OK for the image to start executing code on your computer and eat your lunch. Why would that possibly be considered OK?

What if it's a well-formed image? Does that make it okay when Windows/GNOME's removable media autoexec anti-feature runs a bunch of code from it?