|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 8, 2022 3:20 UTC (Mon) by motk (guest, #51120)
Parent article: OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Who in glub's name is still using this in 2022, what the actual etc.


to post comments

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 9, 2022 12:01 UTC (Tue) by swilmet (subscriber, #98424) [Link]

For old disks kept as archives (not necessarily powered-on all the time in a cloud).

For files that you don't need anymore but you prefer to keep as backup (for 10 years or 20 years), a practice is to have two disks with the same content, but disconnected. From time to time, you may check that the content is still readable.

That way it uses less energy.

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 9, 2022 20:24 UTC (Tue) by hailfinger (subscriber, #76962) [Link] (4 responses)

Me, roughly one month ago when I discovered the hard way that ext4 is not made for many files. Yes, you can use tune2fs at runtime to raise the file limit per directory (large_dir option), but there is no way to undo that except throwing the filesystem away and recreating it from scratch.
GRUB won't boot from an ext4 filesystem with large_dir active, so I suddenly had a non-bootable system with no spare capacity to recreate a working state. Lesson learned.

Then I remembered that ReiserFS (which I had used many years ago when it was more stable than ext3) has no inodes and thus no inode limit. And there are tools to do an in-place conversion to ReiserFS. However, the looming deprecation of ReiserFS and its non-maintenance seem to have accumulated bugs slightly faster than ext4 where bugs are introduced through maintenance (b5776e7). So... ReiserFS was not a choice anymore.

In the end I chose XFS and recreated everything from scratch.

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 11, 2022 13:35 UTC (Thu) by smurf (subscriber, #17840) [Link]

You can do an in-place conversion from extfs to btrfs, though.

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 12, 2022 18:44 UTC (Fri) by k8to (guest, #15413) [Link]

Yeah, reiser was pretty good for a usenet server around 2000, but I think xfs became the standard choice for this type of scenario not that long after. Good luck with your workload.

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 13, 2022 8:31 UTC (Sat) by jem (subscriber, #24231) [Link]

>Me, roughly one month ago when I discovered the hard way that ext4 is not made for many files

It is generally a bad idea to put a huge amount of files in a single directory, no matter what filesystem you are using. You'll run into limits and performance issues. Fortunately, there is a simple solution to this: design your app to spread the files into subdirectories, like Git does.

OpenSUSE considers dropping reiserfs

Posted Aug 20, 2022 21:33 UTC (Sat) by roblucid (guest, #48964) [Link]

I maintained the UNIX habit of a small seperate /boot fs, usually ext2 to avoid such issues.
After running a lot of machines you get defensive from seeing file corruption in / and try to eliminate dramas.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds