CXL 1: Management and tiering

Posted May 17, 2022 8:27 UTC (Tue) by sdalley (subscriber, #18550)
In reply to: CXL 1: Management and tiering by ballombe
Parent article: CXL 1: Management and tiering

Personally, I'm more than happy to trade a little more memory for a little more sanity.

And message passing needn't consume more memory if the message buffer simply changes hands between owners rather than being copied. A good interface to such a message interface can also ensure, under the hood, that references to buffers no longer owned are always NULLed.