Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Posted Feb 25, 2022 17:02 UTC (Fri) by giraffedata (guest, #1954)In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by geert
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon
And that's why the the owner doesn't make you pay for all 10 stories if you don't need them.
And the only reason he doesn't go ahead and let you use the other 8 anyway is that locking you out of them is the only way he can know you're telling the truth when you say you're willing to pay for only 2 stories. Charging people for all the stories they're willing to pay for minimizes the price per story for everyone.
Posted Feb 25, 2022 18:58 UTC (Fri)
by geert (subscriber, #98403)
[Link]
The "10-story" processor still requires more raw material (silicon + whatever else for doping, etching, interconnects, ...). Plus, you can fit more "2 story" processors on the same wafer, so there's a processing cost, too.
Posted Feb 25, 2022 19:06 UTC (Fri)
by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link]
The difference being that it's not a crime to pick or drill out some locks in your own building to access the upper floors. If you were actually renting the building (CPU) that would be a different matter. (And, of course, that the software locks in question are considerably more difficult to either pick or disable than, say, the lock on your average bank vault, much less a normal high-rise.)
Thoughts on software-defined silicon
Thoughts on software-defined silicon
