Intel acquires Linutronix
Linutronix is comprised of a team of highly qualified and motivated employees with a wealth of experience and involvement in the ongoing development of Linux. Led by CEO Heinz Egger and CTO Thomas Gleixner, Linutronix is the architect of PREEMPT_RT (Real Time) and the leading technology provider for industrial Linux. Gleixner has been the principal maintainer of x86 architecture in the Linux kernel since 2008.
The plan is evidently to continue to run Linutronix as an independent
company rather than absorbing it into Intel.
Posted Feb 23, 2022 16:09 UTC (Wed)
by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
[Link] (4 responses)
They always say that, to avoid the employees from all quitting. Then they make the pot warmer and warmer :D
Posted Feb 23, 2022 16:42 UTC (Wed)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (3 responses)
Cheers,
Posted Feb 23, 2022 19:40 UTC (Wed)
by hkario (subscriber, #94864)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 23, 2022 20:03 UTC (Wed)
by JoeBuck (subscriber, #2330)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 23, 2022 23:30 UTC (Wed)
by developer122 (guest, #152928)
[Link]
Posted Feb 23, 2022 16:23 UTC (Wed)
by calumapplepie (guest, #143655)
[Link]
Posted Feb 23, 2022 17:03 UTC (Wed)
by paravoid (subscriber, #32869)
[Link]
I have no inside knowledge to know if this is related or helps or not, but one can only hope it alleviates at least some of these concerns. It'd be good to see funding going to people that have managed to accomplish such a huge initiative. Congrats to the team.
Posted Feb 23, 2022 20:37 UTC (Wed)
by kiko (subscriber, #69905)
[Link]
Posted Feb 23, 2022 23:39 UTC (Wed)
by developer122 (guest, #152928)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Feb 24, 2022 0:04 UTC (Thu)
by intgr (subscriber, #39733)
[Link] (2 responses)
Short of deliberately sabotaging ARM support, which seems unlikely, the only motivator that I see is making the Atom platform better. Which is a win in my book.
Besides, Intel is the underdog in the embedded space, so if anything, this would increase competition in this space rather than decrease it.
Posted Feb 24, 2022 12:40 UTC (Thu)
by joib (subscriber, #8541)
[Link] (1 responses)
https://www.zdnet.com/article/intel-invests-in-open-sourc...
Posted Mar 1, 2022 9:46 UTC (Tue)
by Lawless-M (guest, #155377)
[Link]
Posted Feb 24, 2022 12:08 UTC (Thu)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (3 responses)
If this is all it is, why not just invest in the company? What does acquisition do differently if this is truly the way it's supposed to be perceived?
Posted Feb 24, 2022 12:18 UTC (Thu)
by atnot (subscriber, #124910)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Feb 25, 2022 20:30 UTC (Fri)
by swilmet (subscriber, #98424)
[Link]
Posted Feb 25, 2022 21:22 UTC (Fri)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Why not? Isn't this how VC investing works?
I just don't like seeing small companies get bought up and then amalgamated into the larger beast with only one facet slightly improved in the main products of the larger beast. The graveyard[1] is full of dead companies absorbed without much to show much of the time (AFAICS). And the goodwill that gets burned by not providing continuity for your users just breeds mistrust of the purchasing company in the long run. Not as much as it should, but it's not nice having a service you like and use get absorbed into some massive org like Twitter or Facebook and then you're back to those (IMO) terrible user experiences.
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Wol
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix
Intel acquires Linutronix