|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 19, 2022 15:36 UTC (Sat) by jhoblitt (subscriber, #77733)
In reply to: Thoughts on software-defined silicon by atnot
Parent article: Thoughts on software-defined silicon

I know next to nothing about ICU manufacturing but couldn't that also be a sign as to the differences in TSMC vs Intel defect rates?


to post comments

Thoughts on software-defined silicon

Posted Feb 19, 2022 23:33 UTC (Sat) by atnot (subscriber, #124910) [Link]

Unlikely, as there are two major other differences:

1. AMD could not adjust it's wafer allocations to the shortages easily, as TSMC fab capacity has to be booked far in advance. Intel is far more flexible there.

2. More importantly, unlike Intel, AMD shares silicon between server and desktop processors. Since Server CPUs have far higher margins, this means they are going to prioritize those when push comes to shove as it did last year. In such an environment it makes little sense to launch an SKU for every price point as they usually would.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds