|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 8:13 UTC (Thu) by halla (subscriber, #14185)
In reply to: PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone by jebba
Parent article: PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

No, it's crap hardware. The battery lasts only a couple of hours. Charging the thing makes it almost too hot to touch. It's heavy, clunky and awkward to hold -- not to mention really ugly. Those hardware switches? They make me go "meh". I don't give a damn, because, you know? To make the phone useful, they all need to be on. The screen is very much meh, too. And the software is too ghastly for words.

There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950. But yes, I guess it's comparable to the N900. And that in itself is proof of what I'm saying: no progress at all.


to post comments

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 8:35 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (69 responses)

You just sound bitter. Of course hardware kill switches are important, at least to many people. They certainly don't always need to be on.

The Librem5 is definitely better than the N900. I don't know about the N950. According to wikipedia "Nokia exclusively distributed the device to developers as it was not offered for sale to the public." Lets compare specs of Librem5 to N950, since you keep saying it is worse hardware.

CPU: Librem5 has Quad Arm Cortex-A53 64bit ARM 1.5GHz, the N950 Cortex-A8 @ 1GHz. Librem5 wins, no?

RAM: 1gig for N950, 3 gigs from Librem5. Librem5 wins again, right?

Storage: 16 GB eMMC on the N950, 32 GB on the Librem5. Plus you can do a whopping 2 tb of SD storage on the Librem5 apparently too (!). Librem5 wins.

Positioning: N950 has GPS and A-GPS. The Librem5: multiconstellation GNSS (e.g. not just USA system). Librem5 wins again over N950.

Wifi: Both have 802.11 a/b/g/n. With Librem5 it is removable and has a kill switch. Perhaps Librem5 win, but we'll call it a draw since this is a trouncing already.

Display: 720×1440 on Librem5, 854×480 on N950. Librem5 wins again.

Camera: Both front and rear cameras have more megapixels on Librem5. Librem5 wins again.

I'm getting bored of listing how it is better. It is literally better hardware by significant margins in every spec available. Plus, as an extra special bonus, for the Librem5, you can even get the schematics:

* https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/l5-schematic

@halla
> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.

Except for everything that can be measured.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 12:09 UTC (Thu) by mjw (subscriber, #16740) [Link] (68 responses)

> I'm getting bored of listing how it is better. It is literally better hardware by significant margins in every spec available. Plus, as an extra special bonus, for the Librem5, you can even get the schematics:
>
> * https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/l5-schematic
>
>> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.
>
> Except for everything that can be measured.

It is certainly good they tried to build an Open Hardware device using only Free Software. But have you used it?

The hardware is comparable to my current laptop (mnt reform) and I know it could be a usable device with the right (free) software (I am using firefox with noscript and sway, a full gnome desktop however is somewhat sluggish and anything involving heavy javascript is not really that usable). It is all about expectations. It is a great device for me personally, but if your use case involves some electron apps you will be disappointed. And the librem5 is a much smaller device, so I can believe there might be issues with battery life and heath.

There also don't seem to have been made many. I also backed their fundraiser in 2017, but still haven't received a phone. I can imagine people being somewhat skeptical and disappointed receiving something that might have been a great prototype 5 years ago in 2022.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 13:47 UTC (Thu) by MatejLach (guest, #84942) [Link] (1 responses)

I feel like there are two camps with regards to mobile GNU/Linux; those of us who appreciate the effort involved in bringing up a complete mobile hardware/software ecosystem and the effort that has been put towards it so far, the various failed projects etc. etc. because we realize that there's currently not a good way to truly feel empowered and outside of the spying eyes of Apple/Google with a smartphone, (I am aware of the more privacy oriented Android ROMs that get some way there, but nowhere near to what a truly free software phone should be). We realize that Apple/Google have billions at their disposal and so even having mobile hardware capable of running Linux at all on the market is a win as things are, software can be worked on.

Then there's the camp that just wants to browse Instagram while saying to their Android-carrying friends that they're running "full-blown Linux" at parties. The Librem/PinePhone is not (yet) ready for them.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 20:55 UTC (Fri) by KJ7RRV (subscriber, #153595) [Link]

Yes, as you said, it still takes more effort to use a Linux phone than an Android phone or an iPhone, and not everyone is willing to do it. As far as I can tell, the software is rapidly progressing; hopefully it won't be too long before it's about as usable as the other platforms.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 17:01 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (65 responses)

So @mjw you agree with @halla?

> It's [Librem5] in every respect a regression compared to the N950 from way back.

Or are you just moving the goalposts for them?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 18:36 UTC (Thu) by mjw (subscriber, #16740) [Link] (64 responses)

> So @mjw you agree with @halla?
>
> > It's [Librem5] in every respect a regression compared to the N950 from way back.
>
> Or are you just moving the goalposts for them?

Only Halla seems to have used both the librem5 and the n950. Knowing Halla I trust her review being honest.

I am using similar hardware for my mnt reform laptop, so I know it can be made to work to be productive.
That is a totally different form factor though. I hope it also works when used in a small phone package.
But if Halla says it doesn't I don't doubt her. Even if that makes me a little sad.

I am also a librem5 backer from 2017. But still haven't seen the actual phone in person.
So I cannot tell you what my own experiences with that phone are. I do own a pinephone.
And with the keyboard, which acts as an extra battery (which is really necessary imho),
I am pretty happy with it. I did own a firefox phone before this and also found it acceptable.
Both however still come with various proprietary blobs :{

I assume your experiences are different? Do you have access to a librem5?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 18:49 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (63 responses)

> Knowing Halla

Ok, so you're moving the goalposts for your colleague.

I have Pinephones, a Librem5, N900s, Iridium, Globalstar, Inmarsat, Nexus hammerhead, Nexus bullhead, and others I'm forgetting. @mjw, you stated:

> I can believe there might be issues with battery life and heath. [of Librem5]

I can tell you "I can believe there might be issues with battery life and heath" with every battery powered device on earth, more or less, including all of the devices above. So your statement is really just some fud.

@mjw:

> Only Halla seems to have used both the librem5 and the n950

So hardware specs can't be compared? Is the N950 really so far different from the N900s, which many more have used? The N950 was DoA from day one.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 22:40 UTC (Thu) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (62 responses)

Arte you sure the hardware specs aren't a triumph of hope over experience?

Okay, there's always the odd bit of dud hardware, British Leyland comes to mind :-)

But real world experience trumps specs every time.

Cheers,
Wol

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 22:48 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (61 responses)

So @wol would you agree at least that with me in that, in regards to everything that can be measured, librem5 is superior? The ineffable that only apparently @halla can speak to, the N950 is alleged superior.

@halla
> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.

Except for everything that can be measured.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 21:35 UTC (Fri) by mjw (subscriber, #16740) [Link] (60 responses)

You seem very eager to "win" the argument with hardware facts that people aren't disputing. Apparently you have used different free software/open hardware phones and you feel the review given by Halla (https://valdyas.org/fading/hardware/my-librem-5-has-arrived/) isn't fair.

You could simply state your own perception of using the librem5. How would you compare the software wrt other free software mobile efforts? How is the battery life? Does it run really hot when in use or charging? Can you smoothly scroll text or webpages? What are the pros and cons of the librem5 compared to other past or present open hardware mobile devices? How does it compare in cost?

I actually hope Halla is wrong, since even after 5 years I am still eagerly awaiting my librem5. But I have no reason to doubt she is sincere and really has put the effort into it (years ago, before I even started thinking about backing the librem5).

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 22:00 UTC (Fri) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (6 responses)

> You seem very eager to "win" the argument with hardware facts that people aren't disputing

But people were disputing them. I still state that by everything that can be measured, Librem5 is superior to Nokia's closed trash.

I hadn't seen Halla's review at the URL you linked. I wasn't commenting her review you linked, I was just responding to this thread. The review doesn't say significantly more than is in this thread though.

> You could simply state your own perception of using the librem5

The reality, is I don't use *any* cell phones, despite owning many. I live in Roosevelt National Forest in Northern Colorado. Believe it or not, there is lots of parts of the world that still don't have cell coverage, including me where I sit all day. (This dispite being able to *see* the tower that has the antenna for 25 years--it just doesn't point at me.) My work on it is to establish free/secure communications between people in general, not my own use. That said, I dig in pretty deep as you--you can see examples of that in Maemo wiki link, for example.

> How would you compare the software wrt other free software mobile efforts?

Well considering the desktop they developed (Phosh and other bits) is the most popular even on *other* platforms, it looks like they did a better job that the previous lame proprietary attempts.

> How is the battery life?

You can look at *any* phone on the Internet and find people complaining about battery life.

> Does it run really hot when in use or charging?

I just charged it now to confirm and the answer is NO.

> Can you smoothly scroll text or webpages?

I don't really care.

> What are the pros and cons of the librem5 compared to other past or present open hardware mobile devices?

There's almost too many to list. Look at the earlier list above. The HUGE pros are that it has a great community with a company committed to supporting that community. That's pretty much the exact opposite of Maemo(etc)/Nokia. The fact that the entire design orientation of the phone from the get-go is to protect the user, is a huge plus, because without that, we're just getting spy phones. So they pioneered hardware kill switches. It is the first phone where I can remove a modem and other bits. It is the first phone where you get exensive hardware documentation, including schematics (in KiCAD no less). I even saw on earlier generations they supplied full gerbers!

Cost to me is irrelevant for things like this. But again, I know people that just got out of prison as POWs, have been carbombed, tortured, etc...

(I could be wrong about some "firsts" if they were perhaps in OpenMoko, which I also worked on, but it is soooo long ago.)

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 24, 2022 12:37 UTC (Thu) by nye (subscriber, #51576) [Link] (5 responses)

> The reality, is I don't use *any* cell phones

For fuck's sake. This is perhaps the most *breathtaking* display of the Dunning-Kruger effect that I have ever seen. You are literally unqualified to have so much as an *opinion* on this topic so please stop attacking people who actually have some knowledge and/or experience.

Please

Posted Feb 24, 2022 14:21 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

We had finally managed to move on from this tiresome comment thread, please let's not restart it now.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 24, 2022 16:48 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

> You are literally unqualified to have so much as an *opinion* on this topic

Ridiculous. It's not like I've never used a cell phone. The last ~two years, during covid, I've pretty much just been sitting in the mountains. And where I live doesn't have coverage. I've used them in the past. I rebuilt the entire Librem5 build system to find issues. I even registered the domain "puresauce.org", to host a pure/clean version of PureOS. But it was unneccesary because the Purism folks weren't faking a free software OS, they are actually doing it.

I've done plenty with phones in the past, the best documented being Maemo for N900:

https://wiki.maemo.org/User:Jebba

Experience with N900, such as:

* I did a custom kernel used by others in the community.

* Solved why N900s were turning into bricks.

* Hosted the community's source repo when Nokia's was down.

* First to put Fedora on a N900, and documented how it is done.

* Also documented how to do with Mer.

* I recompiled thousands of packages of Debian Etch for Maemo.

* Documented how to do an encrypted root on the phone, amongst a lot of other docs.

Can you look through that and say I know nothing above cell phones?

It's funny how so many of these threads people are just trying to shut up other people or correct their use of a foreign language, yet those people offer up nothing.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 24, 2022 17:02 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (2 responses)

Also, I'm pretty sure I was the first person to place a phone call with oFono on a Nokia cell phone and document it:

* https://wiki.maemo.org/User:Jebba/Ofono

One more time

Posted Feb 24, 2022 17:22 UTC (Thu) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link] (1 responses)

Please: stop this. LWN isn't a kindergarten playground.

Thank you.

One more time

Posted Feb 24, 2022 17:34 UTC (Thu) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

Ok, I'm out.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 22:05 UTC (Fri) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (45 responses)

> Can you smoothly scroll text or webpages?

To re-iterate on this, which I think is basically the fundamental difference. One side wants smooth scrolling, the other side is concern about people being killed/tortured. One side works with the folks doing the killing/torturing (e.g. Nokia's support of repressive regimes), the other side is trying to fight to get out from under that boot.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 18, 2022 1:11 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (44 responses)

One person: this phone doesn't really work well (list of reasons, some of which sound really fairly dreadful and I'm not sure a phone with a battery like that would even be legal to sell in the UK, it sounds dangerous: maybe an outright fault?)
Other person: though I don't use phones because of where I live, I'm sure this phone works well and I own a lot of similar phones (no possibility of sunk-cost bias though); this UI is 'most popular' and therefore better than the other 'lame proprietary attempts'[1]; btw anyone who disagrees with me is in league with killers and torturers.

Can you see why those of us without much of a dog in this fight might be a bit less than entirely convinced by this? Your crude attempt to paint Halla as some sort of vicious biased poison-penner in league with murderers is unlikely to fly here, where she's been a long-term commenter for years and we *know* that's not what she's like at all.

[1] also, you are apparently ignoring the fact that the proprietary and semi-proprietary competition you dismiss as 'lame' is overwhelmingly more popular to the tune of billions of users against, just possibly, a few tens of thousands at most for the free alternatives: they must be doing *something* right, and claiming they're not and we have already won and our stuff is better than theirs and their UI is just lame and needs no consideration will only ensure that we continue to fail.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 18, 2022 1:39 UTC (Fri) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (43 responses)

This is more fud than even the top comment. At least they didn't suggest the battery was dangerous (no more so than any Li). There don't appear to be any reports of your fire fud in the purism forum either. Do you care to back that up?

I don't use cell phones as I don't have cell phone coverage, but that doesn't mean I can't evaluate them. For the Purism phone I took it completely apart, reviewed components, re-created their entire build system, recompiled everything, went thru the various important bits, went thru gerbers, etc. It's not like I didn't do anything with it. This is true with a number of phones going back pre-OpenMoko and back to a 300 baud modem, if we really want to go back. I was reacting to this:

> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.

Which is so clearly false.

> lame

As far as I know, none of the proprietary Nokia Maemo offsprings have billions of users. I was refering to those proprietary implementations.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 19, 2022 0:18 UTC (Sat) by dboddie (guest, #55461) [Link] (2 responses)

I don't remember if the Gerber files for the development board were made public. I don't think the files for the phone have been published. The schematics can be found in the l5-schematic repository.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 19, 2022 1:25 UTC (Sat) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (1 responses)

They had gerbers and other KiCAD files of earlier versions of the dev boards:

* https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/dvk-mx8m-bsb/-/tree/master...

* https://source.puri.sm/Librem5/dvk-mx8m-bsb

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 19, 2022 12:16 UTC (Sat) by dboddie (guest, #55461) [Link]

Thanks for providing the link. A quick search of the repository names didn't jog any memories when I went looking earlier.

My understanding is that the board files for the phones themselves won't be released until some later point in time.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 14:18 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (39 responses)

Oh, come on, don't call things 'fud' which clearly are a case of spreading fear about reported symptoms that should be frightening. A li-ion-based device where the battery gets painfully hot on charging is *absolutely* the sort of thing which any reasonable person would consider a likely fire risk, mostly because li-ion batteries actually *can and do* catch fire really badly (even if they call it 'venting with flame', and even that euphemism is a less-than-pleasant-sounding thing) and the first symptom of this is invariably the battery getting hot, and shortly afterwards hot enough to deform the casing, and then it's serious burns city. Further comments suggested that this was a software problem and now resolved, but frankly a software problem with those symptoms is bloody worrying to me: this sort of thing should be enforced in hardware and frankly made next to impossible. Devices with li-ion batteries in are chained bombs and should be treated accordingly.

But then I live in the UK, a country with decent electrical regulations where electrical systems simply *do not* under any circumstances cause things to get hot, smoke, or spray sparks, let alone start fires, because if you sell things that do that you get shut down very hard, and if it happens nonetheless the fuse trips (assuming the device is plugged in and charging, of course); hell, even minor shorts that don't do any of those things cause the RCD to trip and the power to go out (not all houses in the UK have RCDs yet but new ones do and it's a legal requirement in rental accommodation too). I understand that much of the world (in particular the US) is quite different.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 15:33 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (29 responses)

@nix
> don't call things 'fud' which clearly are a case of spreading fear about reported symptoms that should be frightening

Except for one Nokian saying it gets hot, do you have any other basis for your fud? I can't find any instance of a fire or similar. The ones that you do mention that catch on fire, which brands were those? None were Librem5 devices, correct? Has a Nokia phone ever gotten hot? Do you have anything MEASUREABLE that shows Purism is worse?

I'd love to see some measurements! Or are you just going to make vague, baseless, accusations instead?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 17:50 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (28 responses)

My "accusations" (which are actually "worries", not "accusations") are based... the blog post that started this subthread. This seems like a reasonable basis, to me. Of course I have nothing measurable, since I don't have a Librem, like almost everyone else, whether they paid for one or not. I wasn't aware that this prohibited me from commenting on apparently serious safety issues highlighted in the original post. Perhaps Halla is not allowed to comment on it either because she didn't a) have a time machine to travel forward in time until a point at which the problem was solved or perhaps b) wasn't severely burned? Maybe she should have cleared everything with you first? I wasn't aware that was a precondition for commenting on LWN either.

Phones (and other devices with li-ion batteries) catching fire is rare because there is a lot of work put into making sure they can't: li-ion batteries do rather want to do that so they need machinery to actively prevent it. Usually when it happens it makes the press because it's so rare. When it happens to more than a few phones, whole brands get withdrawn (remember the Samsung phone fires?). The frequency of (in particular) gas evolution goes up with battery age, which is why you sometimes hear about old Kindles etc with bulging cases. Having anything remotely like it happen to a new device is evidence of a serious design flaw.

In the qualification phase (necessarily applied to new devices rather than old ones), usually getting hot is an automatic fail; deformation of the battery packaging, let alone the enclosing case due to heat or gas evolution is *definitely* an automatic fail. That doesn't mean it never happens in reality in shipping products, but it does mean that there are actual hardware mechanisms in the (mandatory, hardwired) charging circuit that try to prevent it. If the software can get in the charging circuit's way, as this failure mode suggests, that's distinctly worrying, given that that's meant to be impossible and that's the only thing standing between a battery and a bomb (or at least a pile of actual literal flaming wreckage that is likely either burning unattended while charging or burning while attached to your body: neither are good alternatives).

(btw, try not to suggest people have malevolent motives just because they disagree with you: it makes you sound like either a partisan or a flaming conspiracy theorist. I have no dog in this fight, though I at least do *have* a phone and use it, and plan to replace it, and am interested in learning about phones that might replace it, particularly those that use free software -- and would rather not get seriously literally non-metaphorically burned while doing so. Things that heat up a lot while charging, well, they worry me. They should worry you, too.)

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 18:13 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (27 responses)

@nix
> Of course I have nothing measurable

Of course.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 23:56 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (26 responses)

So... just to get this clear: reports that a battery-powered device gets hot when charging do *not* worry you, even though the device in question uses a common battery technology where getting it too hot causes it to burst into corrosive, toxic flame?

I wish I had your courage.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 1:01 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (25 responses)

@nix
> just to get this clear: reports that a battery-powered device gets hot when charging do *not* worry you

Thanks for clarifying that. Yes, *reports* would be concerning. But so far we don't have that. We have one mention that it gets "REALLY hot". So I don't call that "reports", because there is only ONE vague mention of it. It doesn't say whether it is dangerously hot or anything like that either, let alone actual temperature measurements. And no one here has provided anything beyond that single mention.

If the forum or other locations had reports of a fire or people talking about it overheating, yes, it would be concerning.

But so far the only thing I see that is concerning is a wall of text by concern trolls.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 12:55 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (24 responses)

> But so far the only thing I see that is concerning is a wall of text by concern trolls.

More baseless assumptions of malice, despite my asking you to please stop.

At least I have evidence here that starred LWN supporters can still be damn unpleasant people.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 13:13 UTC (Mon) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (23 responses)

The trouble is that too many people have been programmed to think that "anecdote == lie".

An anecdote is a dat*um* point. And people who don't want to face their prejudices write it off "because it's only one". That way they can write off hundreds of anecdotes - "There's no demand for it, and you're the hundredth person I've had to tell that to so far today!!!"

Sorry to get on my hobby horse, but nobody's EVER claimed to me that they found relational was faster than Pick. But they still can't believe the difference is like a tortoise versus Formula 1. They just dismiss the claims as anecdotes.

If people have made their mind up, there's no point bothering them with facts.

Cheers,
Wol

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 16:32 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (22 responses)

I know the difference between an anecdote and a lie.

So far there is exactly one vague assertion that it is "REALLY hot". You've done all these posts, but no one has done anything to substantiate it. Nor have they shown any case of it catching fire or similar.

I still stand by this, stronger than ever:

> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.

Except for everything that can be measured.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 18:04 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (21 responses)

> Except for everything that can be measured.

You keep saying this, are you seriously saying that e.g. battery-life is parameter that cannot be measured?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 18:16 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (1 responses)

OK, lets see some comparative measurements (e.g. doing the same thing--not one building a kernel the other idling).

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 18:37 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link]

I commented because a Librem 5 is something I might have wanted to buy, but not if it has a battery life of one to two hours.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 18:34 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (18 responses)

According to wikipedia the N950 has a 1320 mAh battery.

The Librem5 battery I have here (chestnut generation?) is 2000 mAh.

So that's a comparison that can be made, and again, the Librem5 is *measureably* better.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:01 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (15 responses)

> So that's a comparison that can be made, and again, the Librem5 is *measureably* better.

No. The parameter that is interesting to me is battery life, that is how long can I go before I need to charge the phone. Typically you'd
standardise on a procedure like this: https://www.tomshardware.com/uk/reviews/how-we-test-smart...

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:08 UTC (Mon) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (5 responses)

So if jebba wants *measurable*, what's the DRAW of those two phones.

After all, battery life keeps growing precisely because draw keeps growing. Some of the phones with the BEST battery life has some of the SMALLEST batteries. (Yes I know those phones don't do much except make calls, but surely that's the WHOLE POINT of a phone :-)

Cheers,
Wol

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:25 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

So later Nokia phones that have more mAh than the N950 are a regression?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:52 UTC (Mon) by halla (subscriber, #14185) [Link] (3 responses)

Golly gosh, this thread is still going on... It's getting a bit silly, since all this info is a google away...

Anyway, according to https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N9#Battery, "The Nokia N9 has a BV-5JW 3.8V 1450mAh battery. According to Nokia, this provides from 7h to 11h of continuous talk time, from 16 to 19.5 days of standby, 4.5h of video playback and up to 50h of music playback."

My librem5 had a standby time of two, three hours. Google tells me "From a full charge, the mass production Librem 5 should last from 6 hours with screen on and all hardware-enabled up to 14 hours when idle with screen and WiFi off."

And like I said, I've given it away, to a postmarketos developer, so the postmarketos team now has a total of two librems to work on their OS port. They can make good use of it.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:01 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (2 responses)

How do the N9 and N950 batteries compare with each other in performance?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:15 UTC (Mon) by halla (subscriber, #14185) [Link] (1 responses)

I don't see why I should spoonfeed you information you could look up yourself, but here you go, I'm bored anyway tonight.

The n950's battery was a bit smaller, so maybe you'd only two weeks of standby time out of it, instead of sixteen days... (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nokia_N950 says "N950 has a 1320 mAh battery, Nokia N9 has a 1450 mAh battery". )

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:21 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

So you got two weeks standby on the N950?

If so, that would be something *measureably* better than the Librem5. Seems to be the only plus though.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:21 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (8 responses)

Yes, battery life is interesting to me too. Do you have any measurements comparing it to N950?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:42 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (5 responses)

Why would I? What makes you think I would even be interested in a N950?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 19:46 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (4 responses)

I'm not interested in N950 either (is anyone except the few devs that worked on it?). This sub-thread started because the Librem5 was being compared to the N950.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:16 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (3 responses)

I believe you've misunderstood the point of the original commenter.

Speaking for myself, I will consider any phone which lasts a whole day better than a Librem 5 (assuming that the 2 hour allegation is true), no matter what other
specs it has.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:27 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (2 responses)

"It may be a spy phone, but look at the great battery life!" ?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:38 UTC (Mon) by malmedal (subscriber, #56172) [Link] (1 responses)

I'll even consider "no phone" to be better than a Librem 5. At least that does not take any space in my pocket.

Maybe it's all been said now

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:41 UTC (Mon) by corbet (editor, #1) [Link]

I suspect I'm not the only one who is thinking that this thread had gone on a bit longer than was really necessary. Perhaps it's time to wind it down?

Thank you.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:16 UTC (Mon) by excors (subscriber, #95769) [Link] (1 responses)

The Nokia N9 (1450 mAh, from 2011) was advertised with 450 hours standby time on 3G, and 7 hours talk time [1]. Some testing confirmed the talk time [2] and reported 8h40 of video playback (i.e. screen on). I can't easily find numbers for the N950 (probably because it was a low-volume developer-only device so nobody bothered measuring it), but it had similar hardware and software to the N9 so it's reasonable to assume similar battery life.

Librem 5 (4500 mAh) claims "6 hours with screen on and all hardware-enabled" [3] and "a run time of about 13 hours with the screen and wifi off but data-enabled over 4G" [4]. So it's a 3x larger battery than the N9, but the N9 has slightly better screen-on time and 35x longer idle time (largely because Librem 5 hasn't got suspend-to-RAM working yet).

Not that this comparison is useful in any way. All that really matters is whether the battery lasts until you're in a convenient place to recharge it; for many people that probably means ~24 hours battery life under typical usage so they can recharge overnight and not worry about it dying in the evening when they need to e.g. call a taxi to get home. Librem 5 isn't there yet, and it's hard to tell if software improvements will be enough to get it there. (Other people may have lower requirements, of course, so it may still be okay for them.)

[1] https://www.gsmarena.com/nokia_n9-3398.php
[2] http://blog.gsmarena.com/nokia-n9-full-battery-test-is-re...
[3] https://puri.sm/posts/librem-5-4500mah-battery-upgrade/
[4] https://puri.sm/posts/charging-the-librem-5/

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 20:24 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

So it appears that the N9 has better battery life than the Librem5. And by extension, the N950 may have better battery life. So that is something where the N950 may be better than the Librem5.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 22, 2022 16:52 UTC (Tue) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (1 responses)

> According to wikipedia the N950 has a 1320 mAh battery.
>
> The Librem5 battery I have here (chestnut generation?) is 2000 mAh.

Seriously?! It's quite hard to find any Android phones that literally aren't bottom-of-barrel that have batteries under 3500mAh these days: I've just been shopping; went for a Fairphone (largely because the Pixel 6 has no SD card slot and its 256GiB model appears unavailable, and the Fairphone is repairable) -- and even that, known to be a phone that specializes in things other than battery life, has a 3905mAh battery. I didn't see one single phone under 3300mAh: even ultra-cheap phones like the Moto E20 have 4000mAh batteries these days.

2000 is hilariously small. No *wonder* the battery life is poor. It would be a miracle if it weren't.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 22, 2022 17:47 UTC (Tue) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

The current Librem5 has 4500mAh battery, mine was an earlier generation.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 15:52 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (8 responses)

I was able to find Nokia phones catching fire. I was not able to find a Purism phone catching fire. Let me know if you do. Nokia phones on fire, random reported examples (note these are reported fires in the field, not made up by competitors):

* https://www.indiatvnews.com/technology/news-nokia-phone-c...

* https://www.theinternetpatrol.com/we-didnt-start-the-fire...

* Dailyfails sucks, but they have video:
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1275685/Horr...

* https://www.ubergizmo.com/2014/09/nokia-lumia-920-catches...

* ...

From the looks of it, I could make this list 10x or 100x longer, but you get the idea. Many Nokia phones have caught on fire.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 17:51 UTC (Sun) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (7 responses)

So you actually found evidence that phones with li-ion batteries catch fire, but still you don't think I should be worried by reports of other phones with li-ion batteries getting hot when charging... because they're not the same brand?!

The mind, she boggles.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 18:10 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (6 responses)

I'm saying that Nokia phones catch on fire, and there are examples of it. There are no known examples I have found of the Librem5 catching fire. So your entire basis for suggesting they are somehow worse than others is this single line?

> Then I noticed that when it’s charging it gets REALLY hot

https://valdyas.org/fading/hardware/my-librem-5-has-arrived/

Do you have anything more substantive than that? The person that made that claim even wrote: "yes, probably I am biased". So the entire fud you push is based on someone with a documented conflict of interest, that says they are biased, that has nothing *measureable*, and there aren't other instances suggesting it is more dangerous than any other Li? That's your basis?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 18:28 UTC (Sun) by Wol (subscriber, #4433) [Link] (3 responses)

Do Nokia make their own batteries? Do Librem buy their batteries from the same people Nokia do?

At the end of the day, Li-Ion batteries catch fire and explode. And I very much doubt the phone makers make their own. So I'm with Nix on this one ... ANY phone is a risk, the only question is "how much?"

Cheers,
Wol

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 18:36 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link] (2 responses)

There's nothing to suggest that the Librem5 is more dangerous than any phone out there. It is brought up just for fud.

Looking at the Librem5 battery it is made by a huge Chinese battery manufacturer that has a worldwide customer base, so their batteries have likely landed in a wide variety of phones.

@wol:
> So I'm with Nix on this one ... ANY phone is a risk, the only question is "how much?"

From everything *measureable*, such as field reports, it appears the Librem5 is safer than Nokia. On the one hand, you have a conflicted party making the claim that it gets "REALLY hot". On the other hand, there are many reports of the Nokia phones actually catching on fire. I'm not saying this can't happen to every brand out there--it can. But suggesting that the Librem5 is somehow bad or worse than others is just fud.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 0:00 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (1 responses)

> On the one hand, you have a conflicted party making the claim that it gets "REALLY hot".

Your entire basis for calling Halla a "conflicted party" appears to be that you disagree with her. Do you cast aspersions on the motives of everyone who disagrees with you, or what?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 21, 2022 1:03 UTC (Mon) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

She herself said she was biased on this very page.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 20:01 UTC (Sun) by excors (subscriber, #95769) [Link] (1 responses)

> I'm saying that Nokia phones catch on fire, and there are examples of it. There are no known examples I have found of the Librem5 catching fire.

Nokia Mobile reportedly sold 55 million phones (mostly non-smart) in 2020 [1]. Librem 5 had around 3000 preorders in 2017 [2] and still hasn't finished shipping them. When there's a ~100,000x difference in the number of units in the wild, it doesn't seem very useful to compare the number of news reports of rare events.

(Of course anecdotes aren't statistically meaningful either, though when one anecdote represents ~0.1% of the product's users it can't easily be dismissed as a fluke, so it seems worth investigating the root cause to determine if there's a serious problem.)

(Incidentally, even if battery fires aren't an issue, I think there are safety regulations (like IEC 60950-1) which limit the temperatures of touchable surfaces to avoid burning the user, so that may still be a concern.)

[1] https://mobiili.fi/2021/06/03/nokia-puhelinyhtio-hmd-glob...
[2] https://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2017/10/purism-librem-5-crowd...

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 20, 2022 20:37 UTC (Sun) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

Are you suggesting that the Librem5 is in excess of IEC 60950-1?

All this is just fud that could be thrown at any phone out there, except some of them have actual examples of failure, while others don't. I still stand by this, now moreso than ever:

@halla
>> There is nothing in the librem5 that is an improvement on the N950.

> Except for everything that can be measured.

There have been many, many posts in this thread, yet none of them has shown anything measureable where the N950 is better. There has been a lot of handwaving that could apply to any phone, with nothing concrete. To me that shows that the Librem5 is *clearly superior* to any of the Nokia spyphones. I have listed where is is better in measureable ways. I haven't seen anything to dispute that, despite l the wall of texts against it.

As for @excors:
> it seems worth investigating the root cause to determine if there's a serious problem.

I agree. Where should we start? How about the person making the claim substantiate it?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 23:51 UTC (Fri) by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946) [Link] (2 responses)

> You seem very eager to "win" the argument with hardware facts that people aren't disputing

Keep in mind, for some folks, this is a lot more ideological and therefore they are going to take offense at or attempt to dismiss any review that doesn't praise the PinePhone because in their mind, there aren't a lot of a viable alternatives. The flaws, perceived or otherwise, doesn't really matter to them. They would view any criticism of the phone as shills engaging in a proxy attack on Free software or privacy as opposed to just a criticism of this particular implementation. You are going to end up talking past each other if you don't recognize this.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 0:31 UTC (Sat) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

I appreciate this comment, as I myself certainly support PinePhones (and Purism and any similar effort). But most certainly there are *technical details* which can be looked at. And in *every single aspect* the Librem5 beats Nokia. That's what got me started on this thread, was to dispute that garbage that there were supposedly no advances with the Librem. Plus Purism added many features never seen before, which puts it in a class beyond Nokia.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 0:56 UTC (Sat) by jebba (guest, #4439) [Link]

I'll also note in passing that I was the first person to get Fedora running on the N900:

* https://wiki.maemo.org/User:Jebba/Fedora

* https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=38987

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 22:45 UTC (Sat) by dos (guest, #103671) [Link] (3 responses)

> How would you compare the software wrt other free software mobile efforts?

I prefer phosh to other environments (but I may be biased as I take part in developing it :))

> How is the battery life?

Enough for me, about half a day. Improvements like an option to use suspend-to-RAM are still coming.

> Does it run really hot when in use or charging?

No, unless something constantly chugs the CPU at 100%, but all phones will get warm then. However, placing it near a small fan is enough to even compile large things on it without thermal throttling. It can also get quite warm when docked to an external screen and used like a computer, but that's probably not a surprise.

> Can you smoothly scroll text or webpages?

Yes.

> What are the pros and cons of the librem5 compared to other past or present open hardware mobile devices?

Cons: lacks hardware keyboard, it's big (took some time to get used to it switching from N900), early units had issues with GPS sensitivity, has no easily accessible UART access
Pros: several components are of visibly higher quality than PinePhone's, it's reasonably performant, has exceptionally easy recovery from bricking so you don't have to be afraid when hacking, it's actually usable when docked to an external screen

(not mentioning software stuff where things getting improved is just a matter of time, so such comments easily get out-of-date)

> How does it compare in cost?

Poorly, but a big chunk of that cost is directed towards software development (which then spreads to other devices as well), which is quite different from similar past or present efforts.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 13, 2022 12:08 UTC (Sun) by mjw (subscriber, #16740) [Link] (2 responses)

Thanks. It is good to hear from someone actually using a librem5. My own experiences are only with a firefox phone (sony experia) and more recently a pinephone.

> > How would you compare the software wrt other free software mobile efforts?
>
> I prefer phosh to other environments (but I may be biased as I take part in developing it :))

I am using phosh with postmarketOS and I do like it because it feels (and is of course based on) the GNOME stack which gives the phone a similar feel as my workstation environment (although it does feel a little heavyweight), although I use sway on my laptop. As far as I understand phosh with pureos would also give me a normal glibc based system. Which would be really nice.

> > How is the battery life?
>
> Enough for me, about half a day. Improvements like an option to use suspend-to-RAM are still coming.

That seems comparable to the pinephone, which seems to last 8 till 12 hours. I think that is not really enough for daily use. So I got the keyboard for it, which includes a huge battery so it can last for almost 24 hours (but of course now it is about 3 times bigger than a normal phone).

> > What are the pros and cons of the librem5 compared to other past or present open hardware mobile devices?
>
> Cons: lacks hardware keyboard, it's big (took some time to get used to it switching from N900), early units had issues with GPS sensitivity, has no easily accessible UART access
> Pros: several components are of visibly higher quality than PinePhone's, it's reasonably performant, has exceptionally easy recovery from bricking so you don't have to be afraid when hacking, it's actually usable when docked to an external screen
>
> (not mentioning software stuff where things getting improved is just a matter of time, so such comments easily get out-of-date)

Right, that has been my experience with the pinephone and postmarketOS too. It feels much nicer now than when I got it just a few months ago.

> > How does it compare in cost?
>
> Poorly, but a big chunk of that cost is directed towards software development (which then spreads to other devices as well), which is quite different from similar past or present efforts.

I don't mind funding free software development, but it is somewhat ironic that I had to buy another phone (which is just 1/4th the price and arrived within 2 weeks of ordering) to take advantage of that. I get the impression purism never shipped more than a few hundred units to some of its early backers and have trouble producing more. It would be really nice to actually get a phone after 5 years.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 13, 2022 13:07 UTC (Sun) by dos (guest, #103671) [Link]

> I get the impression purism never shipped more than a few hundred units to some of its early backers and have trouble producing more.

Low thousands have been already shipped, but the remaining queue is still long. Yes, producing more is troublesome because there's worldwide shortage of i.MX8M SoCs, so new batches only get produced and shipped once enough SoCs are procured.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 13, 2022 15:54 UTC (Sun) by KJ7RRV (subscriber, #153595) [Link]

If you want a glibc system, maybe you could try another PinePhone distro? DanctNIX and Mobian both use glibc, as far as I know.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 9:12 UTC (Thu) by rbtree (guest, #129790) [Link] (1 responses)

> Those hardware switches? They make me go "meh". I don't give a damn, because, you know? To make the phone useful, they all need to be on.

Uh-huh. Spoken from a truly privileged position.

I live in a country where people get thrown in prison or killed for going to a peaceful protest. If I could get those hardware switches in a more mainstream device, it would be very useful indeed.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Mar 4, 2022 14:15 UTC (Fri) by chmod_a+rwx (guest, #157240) [Link]

You mean Canada?

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 10, 2022 14:23 UTC (Thu) by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958) [Link]

> not to mention really ugly

I don't understand… all phones are a rectangle covered in glass on one side, and plastic/glass on the other.

And if you want your phone to last more than a couple of weeks you'll have to cover it with a case, so how it looks on the back doesn't matter, and in the front is a piece of glass.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 10:58 UTC (Fri) by ale2018 (guest, #128727) [Link] (11 responses)

> The battery lasts only a couple of hours.

Maybe a few hours more if the phone sleeps, but never 24.

> Those hardware switches? They make me go "meh".

Despite Snowden film's suggestion, I tried putting a cell-phone in a microwave oven and call it from the line phone. It rang. I bet the switches are more effective, albeit I need a magnifying glass and a Swiss Army knife to operate them.

Anyway, the reason I'm not using my PinePhone is that I'm unable to input a 64-byte network password. I tried twice, every time from scratch. WPS would be much better, however (slightly) insecure.

WiFi

Posted Feb 11, 2022 17:13 UTC (Fri) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167) [Link] (2 responses)

I guess from your decision to have a 64-bit WiFi password you would prefer to actually secure the network. For WiFi, prefer to have a separate 802.1x system authenticate your access credentials, this is sometimes called "Enterprise" mode WPA.

The reason isn't that this separate system will have better password security (your password might be "password") but that having handed off this problem to the other system WiFi will secure your network access with arbitrary random symmetric keys because you don't care what the keys are. Whereas when you use that 64 byte WiFi password it IS your key (until WPA3) and unless you have disabled WPA2 and updated all the hardware to close remaining loopholes attackers may be able to recover the key.

A WPA2 (or WPA) "personal" network can be snooped silently by anybody who knows, or expects to eventually discover, the shared secret password, everything anybody on the network transmits is "secured" by that shared secret. If they choose to transmit, they can impersonate the Access Points or their clients or both as they wish.

WiFi

Posted Feb 18, 2022 1:17 UTC (Fri) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link] (1 responses)

Hm. This is something of which I had never heard before. Any suggestions as to what system should be doing the actual securing? (Assuming, of course, I can find any wifi APs costing under £400 and which are actually available in this shortage economy which can do such a thing. My UniFi can, I think, but I really want to move away from it... and not only because it's twelve years old.)

WiFi

Posted Feb 19, 2022 20:48 UTC (Sat) by tialaramex (subscriber, #21167) [Link]

Unless you actually _are_ a large enterprise (in which case you should have done this long ago) you just need any RADIUS server such as FreeRADIUS. I have no suggestion on APs. However if you're buying a new AP anyway, you get the same security upgrade if you speak WPA3 regardless of whether you have Enterprise mode so that saves learning how RADIUS works.

Essentially WPA3 gives everybody the WiFi network security you'd get with Enterprise (even if bad guys know the password for your network they can't just decrypt radio messages, they need to actively authenticate to the network and get issued with random keys to use it), and so for Enterprise which already had those benefits the upgrade is mostly little nice-to-have improvements like, Protected Management Frames are always switched on.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 11, 2022 21:08 UTC (Fri) by KJ7RRV (subscriber, #153595) [Link] (7 responses)

What problem have you had entering the password? The PinePhone WiFi shouldn't be any different from a laptop.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 11:23 UTC (Sat) by ale2018 (guest, #128727) [Link] (6 responses)

I've used that 64 byte password for years, stored on a small USB key thaat one can copy it from and paste it when asked to. The PinePhone has no other input system than a virtual keyboard —oops, right after writing that sentence I recalled the microSD.

In general, long network passwords are ubiquitous. I'll try and set up WPS. It should be preinstalled.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 15:47 UTC (Sat) by KJ7RRV (subscriber, #153595) [Link] (2 responses)

Do you have the convergence docking bar? A USB drive should work with the dock.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 12, 2022 22:47 UTC (Sat) by dos (guest, #103671) [Link] (1 responses)

Even a passive USB-C to USB-A adapter should do.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 13, 2022 1:54 UTC (Sun) by KJ7RRV (subscriber, #153595) [Link]

Yes, that would work too.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 13, 2022 9:24 UTC (Sun) by tzafrir (subscriber, #11501) [Link]

Mobian is configured by default (or is it with installing the tweaks package?) to set a usb0 network interface. For me, ssh over that interface from my laptop is the simplest way to copy files. Or ssh over it and setup the interface using nmtui or whatever.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 19, 2022 22:40 UTC (Sat) by tpiekarski (guest, #138813) [Link]

Why you do not memorize it then? :D
To be frank having such secure password for your precious WLAN and keeping it at some USB pendrive to copy&paste it around is, well... let me guess this pendrive is encrypted and the passphrase is stored on another pendrive, so I guess one Micro-SD card slot won't do the trick. Sorry I know my comment is stupid but I can not help it... just use a normal-length password.

PinePhone: trying out a Linux-based smartphone

Posted Feb 19, 2022 23:18 UTC (Sat) by tpiekarski (guest, #138813) [Link]

Sorry, I apologize for the sarcasm in my previous comment. I hope you could gain access to your WLAN using WPS or with a microSD and now started using an online PinePhone.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds