|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Python discusses deprecations

Python discusses deprecations

Posted Dec 13, 2021 14:50 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304)
In reply to: Python discusses deprecations by pebolle
Parent article: Python discusses deprecations

> any hope of a future for perl5 is best described by the perl7 farce. (Did lwn.net ever cover that? It's hilarious.)

I dunno. After the usual pile of weird and impractical suggestions (because that's how development of almost anything *works*, it's just that this is in the open), it's converged on something reasonable: you get Perl 5 unless you say 'use 7'. i.e., the backward compatibility policy is unchanged, which means that you can expect everyone to upgrade to Perl 7 sooner or later, replacing Perl 5 completely, without worrying about things breaking or having to do massive audits of code nobody's looked at in twenty years and whose sole maintainer died of oxygen abuse ten years ago.


to post comments

Python discusses deprecations

Posted Dec 13, 2021 16:15 UTC (Mon) by pebolle (guest, #35204) [Link] (1 responses)

> After the usual pile of weird and impractical suggestions

I seem to remember that at one point some people suggested yet another split (i.e., a third version of Perl).

> it's converged on something reasonable: you get Perl 5 unless you say 'use 7'. i.e., the backward compatibility policy is unchanged,

I remember that too, and I also found it reasonable. But did anything actually happen? Has a decision been made to do a v7.0.0 instead of, say, v5.40.0? Nothing like that was mentioned on lwn.net.

Python discusses deprecations

Posted Dec 13, 2021 17:59 UTC (Mon) by nix (subscriber, #2304) [Link]

I thought it had been decided, but maybe I was hallucinating: I can't find any code for it or any sign of it anywhere.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds