SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
Posted Dec 5, 2021 20:19 UTC (Sun) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)In reply to: SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit by geert
Parent article: SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
Posted Dec 5, 2021 20:56 UTC (Sun)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (3 responses)
A lawyer *should* provide honest advice. Managers *should* act properly on advice. Will they do what they're supposed to do, or will dishonest managers and lawyers (and judges?) collude to burn the company a la SCOG?
Retainer or payoll shouldn't matter. The danger for Vizio is that they succeed in defeating SFC in this battle, only for them to come back as a pure copyright infringement. In the UK I think that would open up management to criminal charges ...
Wouldn't it be nice if SFC demanded the company as statutory damages, then opened everything up and span it off as an employee co-operative :-) Send a warning shot over the bows of the industry as a whole ... :-)
Cheers,
Posted Dec 6, 2021 0:38 UTC (Mon)
by pabs (subscriber, #43278)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Dec 6, 2021 8:27 UTC (Mon)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (1 responses)
Cheers,
Posted Dec 6, 2021 8:39 UTC (Mon)
by pabs (subscriber, #43278)
[Link]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statutory_damages_for_copyr...
SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
Wol
SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
Wol
SFC: First Update on the Vizio lawsuit
