Firefox 91 released
Posted Aug 10, 2021 17:26 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (24 responses)
Posted Aug 10, 2021 17:29 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (14 responses)
I don't see how they could screw it up even more.
Posted Aug 10, 2021 18:03 UTC (Tue)
by dowdle (subscriber, #659)
[Link]
Posted Aug 10, 2021 18:26 UTC (Tue)
by zdzichu (subscriber, #17118)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted Aug 10, 2021 18:28 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (2 responses)
Who the hell decided that teal color for buttons and fonts is a good idea? WTF is WRONG with this person?
Posted Aug 10, 2021 20:23 UTC (Tue)
by flussence (guest, #85566)
[Link]
Guess I'll just hold off on updating until a third party cleans up the mess after them.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 2:31 UTC (Wed)
by kenmoffat (subscriber, #4807)
[Link]
Writing this from seamonkey which has a blue line above the active tab and proper dividers between them, which I think is how things used to be.
I see I'm using the System theme.
But apart from that it works well - just a shame that it needs to be patched to build on glibc-2.34.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 1:34 UTC (Wed)
by roc (subscriber, #30627)
[Link] (8 responses)
No issues with font colors and checkboxes here (though I'm on Nightly). That doesn't sound like a deliberate change.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 3:47 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (6 responses)
It was quantifyably worse for me. And I don't really get what are the supposed advantages.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 13:51 UTC (Wed)
by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link] (3 responses)
The TST documentation then includes a userChrome.css recipe that users can choose to apply if they like, to get rid of either the native tabs only (leaving the tabbar for other content if desired), or the entire tabbar. The author does stress that this is at your own risk and doesn't really recommend it, but I've found that as long as I have other ways of switching tabs if I need them (like the control-tab keyboard shortcut or a tab-button extension such as Tab List), the extra space not having the tabbar frees up is more valuable to me than the risks. Plus worse-comes-to-worse, I could always delete or temporarily move the userChrome.css file if I needed to.
Like I said not for everyone, and I was initially skeptical, but it certainly changed my firefox usage, and I believe I first read about it in a comment such as this somewhere, so if I can pass that on...
Then you don't really have to care /what/ firefox does to its tabbar. =:^) (Well, as long as that userChrome.css hack works, but like I said TST is a recommended extension with a rather active community around it that Mozilla's obviously aware of and supports, so I don't consider that /too/ likely.)
Posted Aug 11, 2021 19:28 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted Aug 12, 2021 2:41 UTC (Thu)
by interalia (subscriber, #26615)
[Link]
What superpower is this and how do I get it?
Posted Aug 12, 2021 9:25 UTC (Thu)
by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link]
1) Hotkeys. In addition to the usual X/close button and the optional TST panel-toggle button, TST defaults to F1 (of course switchable using FF's normal hotkey management) to toggle it on and off. That's invaluable.
Additionally, one of TST's helper extensions (Tab Flip) allows toggling between the current and previous tabs. Along with a bit of CSS theming to color-code the previous tab (normally only the current tab is alt-colored) and flipping just by clicking the current tab to flip to the previous one, there's a default Shift-F2 hotkey for that as well (which I switched to simply F2, to match the F1 for TST itself). Anyone with a workflow involving repeated flipping between two tabs should find this useful, especially since the TST sidepanel doesn't have to be open to use the hotkey.
It didn't take long for those F1/F2 hotkeys to embed themselves in my muscle-memory! =:^)
2) Modern "ultrawide" display form-factors. Typical web pages are designed to display to 1024-1280 px minimum widths without forcing horizontal scrolling, while full-HD 1920 or 4K 3840 display widths are increasingly common. Even with a moderate desktop side-panel a browser window can be 1800 pixels wide or so, leaving plenty of room beside the web page for a browser side-panel. By contrast, web pages of more than a screen full are the norm and while vertical scrolling is virtually painless in a modern UI, the additional vertical space a horizontal tabbar requires tends to be far more painful than that of a vertical tab panel -- especially when the tab panel's easily toggled by the F1 key and F2 toggles current/previous even when the panel's closed, while the tabbar... not so much!
3) Once I had embedded TST into my workflow and more than say a half-dozen tabs were much easier to handle, I discovered an additional usage. I have a (separate) feed-reader to follow various news sites (including LWN), with one in particular feeding triple-digit articles a day. Now I can scan down the feed clicking on articles that look interesting without having to worry about overloading the tabbar. Even if I exceed the nearly 50 tabs visible at once in the tab panel (with my selected font size) I don't often exceed two pages worth, a whole lot easier to manage than more than twice that on the tabbar. And that's in addition to collapsible subtrees should I happen to need 'em.
Of course all those "extra" tabs are soon cleared, but it does allow me to do a much bigger batch at once without the pain of having to sort thru a bunch of additional pages to find the one tab I need, during the time they're open.
And of course the same "batch processing" flow works if you're opening say a bunch of full-size images from a single thumbnail page, or middle-click-opening a bunch of articles from the pocket section of the newtab page, etc. Once that ~half-dozen-tabs-viewable-at-once limit is lifted...
Tho again, it's what works for me, not something that I expect to work for everyone. But if someone else finds it useful...
Posted Aug 12, 2021 22:24 UTC (Thu)
by janecek (subscriber, #74774)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Aug 12, 2021 23:43 UTC (Thu)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
Posted Aug 11, 2021 5:04 UTC (Wed)
by BerendDeSchouwer (subscriber, #97789)
[Link]
In the light theme, it's definitely necessary to make the tabs (much) wider in about:config, to prevent mistaking one tab for another. It's much less of an issue for me in the stock dark theme. The reason wider tabs helps is because then I get some text which helps define the border. With the stock tab width the text -- if any -- instantly fades away, so the whole thing is a smear.
Different fonts are unreadable in light/dark, in different places. Sometimes I get dark-blue on dark-grey, sometimes white-on-light-blue, and other such combinations.
How much of a problem it is also depends on the room light. I work in both darkness and outside in sunlight, hence the frequent swaps between dark/light theme.
Different monitors (different locations) can make it worse, along with Wayland's lack of a gamma correction.
It's not good to design the default theme for perfect hardware and room light conditions. It's like designing your network stack for no dropped packets.
Having said all that, the new theme isn't terrible for me, but it definitely needs work.
Posted Aug 10, 2021 21:02 UTC (Tue)
by mbiebl (subscriber, #41876)
[Link] (7 responses)
Posted Aug 10, 2021 21:03 UTC (Tue)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link] (6 responses)
Posted Aug 11, 2021 20:01 UTC (Wed)
by mbiebl (subscriber, #41876)
[Link] (5 responses)
Too bad, I'm not a an of the new UI either.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 20:15 UTC (Wed)
by mbiebl (subscriber, #41876)
[Link] (4 responses)
I'm currently considering switching to firefox-esr.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 20:36 UTC (Wed)
by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)
[Link]
I'm not optimistic about long-term, though.
Posted Aug 14, 2021 11:46 UTC (Sat)
by wtarreau (subscriber, #51152)
[Link] (1 responses)
Firefox started to commit slow suicide years ago when they started to follow chrome on stupid and annoying things just to "look cool", without realizing that their supporters were probably praising its reliability and predictability more than the "modern" look of chrome.
At *every* single firefox update I'm more and more pissed off by their changes, and have yet to figure a *single* benefit over the previous version. Everything they do makes their browser more painful to use. The last benefit I got years ago was when they implemented the ability to reload a previous session on startup because it allowed me to easily stop its CPU wastage by a simple "killall firefox" then reload it once I need it. Since then, only annoying junk, resource consumption and extreme confusion in the user interface. Yet they're wondering why their users are leaving.
Posted Aug 15, 2021 13:32 UTC (Sun)
by k8to (guest, #15413)
[Link]
But what's the other option? Chrome is a privacy disaster. Firefox isn't great on privacy but there are unbreakme patches you can get least.
Posted Aug 16, 2021 5:36 UTC (Mon)
by Duncan (guest, #6647)
[Link]
There is of course a small risk something actually is incompatible, thus the backup, but I've not had problems with removing it, and in fact put an exist-conditional rm in my firefox wrapper script (which I just looked up to tell you exactly which file to rm) and haven't worried about it since.
Posted Aug 11, 2021 7:27 UTC (Wed)
by iabervon (subscriber, #722)
[Link]
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
But that means having to create a fresh use profile and recreating all my settings, as firefox-esr refuses to read the profile from FF 91. And using firefox-esr just means I'm on borrowed time. Not a great prospect either.
Firefox 91 released
Firefox 91 released
Just restart firefox 4.76 to rememer how convenient and fast browsers were by then and you'll hate your new version even more...
Firefox 91 released
Firefox profile not working on earlier versions, possible solution
Firefox 91 released