|
|
Subscribe / Log in / New account

Code humor and inclusiveness

Code humor and inclusiveness

Posted Jun 17, 2021 18:50 UTC (Thu) by klbrun (subscriber, #45083)
In reply to: Code humor and inclusiveness by randomguy3
Parent article: Code humor and inclusiveness

Since a cigarette is something you burn, could the use of fag to mean cigarette be, in fact, homophobic?


to post comments

Code humor and inclusiveness

Posted Jun 17, 2021 19:09 UTC (Thu) by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784) [Link]

Practically? Possibly.

It appears the etymology's independent. Having poked around on en.wiktionary.org:

The "gay man" usage is a contraction of "faggot", which as well as meaning "bundle of sticks", "bundle of metal rods", "burning ember", and "English meatball" also came to mean "shrewish woman" and later (I dare say by extension of the "shrewish woman" sense, with some possible influence from a Yiddish term "feygele" which means "little bird", "loved one", and (offensively) "homosexual man") came to mean "homosexual and/or effeminate man".

The "cigarette" usage appears to me to be likely to be a back-construction from using "fag-end" (a very old term meaning "remnant or worst portion", etymologically distinct from the above) to refer to the unsmoked remnant of a cigarette.

Code humor and inclusiveness

Posted Jul 13, 2021 9:21 UTC (Tue) by roblucid (guest, #48964) [Link]

No, the word as used most commonly in literature before the cigarette slang, meant junior boarding school boys who had chores for seniors. All intended to be character building and young gentleman would never abuse such power, would they?
You can contort any words for cigarette to be homophobic following your argument, which disproves it by reductio ad absurdum.


Copyright © 2025, Eklektix, Inc.
Comments and public postings are copyrighted by their creators.
Linux is a registered trademark of Linus Torvalds