The second half of the 5.13 merge window
The second half of the 5.13 merge window
Posted May 11, 2021 5:11 UTC (Tue) by smurf (subscriber, #17840)Parent article: The second half of the 5.13 merge window
Wait, a new path-related system call without a fd_at argument and without flags?
Looks like "lesson not learned" to me.
Posted May 11, 2021 6:48 UTC (Tue)
by matthias (subscriber, #94967)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 11, 2021 18:20 UTC (Tue)
by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link] (1 responses)
Each command takes a *different* structure, or in some cases no structure at all. And not all of the structures are versioned to allow them to be extended with extra fields. A new system call which takes a path string but no fd_at argument or flags related to path resolution (RESOLVE_BENEATH, RESOLVE_IN_ROOT, etc.) seems like a step backward to me as well. These ought to be standard for any new path-based system call.
Posted May 12, 2021 11:08 UTC (Wed)
by jan.kara (subscriber, #59161)
[Link]
The second half of the 5.13 merge window
The second half of the 5.13 merge window
The second half of the 5.13 merge window