Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Posted Feb 1, 2021 8:21 UTC (Mon) by Wol (subscriber, #4433)In reply to: Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary by kemitchell
Parent article: Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
It does NOT say "the Corresponding Source must be released under this licence".
It says "the Corresponding Source AS A WHOLE WORK .... EXCLUDING any sections that are identifiable and not derived works" (ie pretty much any source file you have not edited!) And if you edit a source file it becomes a derived work, and you must release your modifications to it "under this licence".
You are making the same mistake I have a habit of making - you are not READING THE FULL TEXT. It's called "taking things out of context" and it leads to exactly this sort of mistake.
Cheers,
Wol
Posted Feb 1, 2021 18:01 UTC (Mon)
by kemitchell (subscriber, #124442)
[Link] (3 responses)
"Derivative works" aren't necessarily limited to files you edit.
Posted Feb 1, 2021 18:51 UTC (Mon)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link] (2 responses)
You misquote legalese. You have too many glib answers. And you've made no attempt whatsoever to address direct questions as to how you'd achieve what you say others must do!
Sorry - that's ABSOLUTELY TYPICAL troll.
Cheers,
Posted Feb 3, 2021 21:46 UTC (Wed)
by nix (subscriber, #2304)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted Feb 3, 2021 23:17 UTC (Wed)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
Certainly if you edit source file A and re-release it, the resulting *binary* is a derived work, but source files B, C and D are not.
kemitchell is classic troll, relying on people like you missing that fact ... *detail* *matters*.
Cheers,
Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Wol
Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Elastic promises "open"—delivers proprietary
Wol
