Jansson: On the Graying of GNOME
Jansson: On the Graying of GNOME
Posted Dec 17, 2020 7:52 UTC (Thu) by Cyberax (✭ supporter ✭, #52523)In reply to: Jansson: On the Graying of GNOME by joshl
Parent article: Jansson: On the Graying of GNOME
Indeed. And you end up with unusable nonsense. Look at iPad applications on macOS - they are nigh unusable because of this.
> Have you ran tests on this? I certainly don't think so. Counterpoint: I interact with GNOME primarily with my keyboard and it's fluid and fantastic. Launching apps, opening files and folders, managing windows and multiple desktops, all can be done efficiently with just a keyboard with shortcuts that make sense.
We have a real-life test: flagging popularity of Linux on desktop. GNOME3 drove me personally away to macOS.
>>Which are basically EVERYONE, since GNOME has never shipped on a touch-based device.
> Why? Linux, overwhelmingly, isn't running on desktop computers because it shipped on them.
I'm not following. GNOME2 had been partially successful, it was gaining popularity with actual first-party manufacturer support (e.g. Dell, IBM). And GNOME3 caused a lot of problems for the existing users in an attempt to capture tablet market.
To be fair, Windows 8 made the same mistake. But unlike GNOME they also supported Windows 7 during the lifetime of Win8.
> If I pay for a laptop with a touch-enabled screen or a 2-in-1 convertible, I'm not interested in desktop environments that patronise me and tell me I'm buying my hardware wrong.
Yet forcing users to GNOME3's "unique" desktop model was fine?
Posted Dec 17, 2020 13:38 UTC (Thu)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link]
Things like laptops with touch screen, 2:1 laptops and netbooks etc was what GNOME was targeting. Not iPads.
Jansson: On the Graying of GNOME