When have webbrowsers become about video?
When have webbrowsers become about video?
Posted Nov 2, 2020 23:18 UTC (Mon) by mirabilos (subscriber, #84359)In reply to: When have webbrowsers become about video? by mathstuf
Parent article: Firefox 82.0 and ESR 78.4.0
Is this specific to mpv? (I’m using normal mplayer as I found I slightly prefer it over mpv and really hate mplayer2 and never could even begin to figure out how to use vlc…)
OTOH for actual youtube downloads I normally add a format option, so I don’t mind the two-step way. I download to /tmp then can watch while the next, if any, downloads. (I don’t watch videos much anyway.)
Posted Nov 2, 2020 23:48 UTC (Mon)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link] (1 responses)
I dropped mplayer years ago (late 2013, early 2014 based on when my first patches landed) and implemented the one feature I noticed was missing into FFmpeg and implemented a few other features I found to be useful myself. I found mpv's development process to be a lot easier than mplayer's (not least because the codebase is a lot cleaner).
Posted Nov 3, 2020 0:03 UTC (Tue)
by mirabilos (subscriber, #84359)
[Link]
I’ve not normally got wide enough internet access that I can live seek in videos… ☺
Incidentally (forgot this in my first reply), shortly after posting the first comment here, someone sent me a soundcloud link, and the browser didn’t have any audible audio from it, but it worked with youtube-dl and mpg123… crazy world.
When have webbrowsers become about video?
When have webbrowsers become about video?