Was it something we said?

Was it something we said?

Posted Apr 29, 2004 22:55 UTC (Thu) by jre (guest, #2807)
Parent article: SCO's answer to IBM's second amended counterclaims (Groklaw)

Notably, the fact that SCO "failed to put out a press release" on the GPL's constitutionality is part of a recent pattern. Darl, Chris and Blake have been uncharacteristically silent -- have they heeded Baystar's advice to zip it?

Mark Heise has not enlightened us on his (evidently) evolving theory of constitutional law and copyright -- has he suddenly remembered that he's a lawyer?

I was just about to say that nothing had been entered into WLTSIM since April 1st -- but wait! Darl couldn't resist after all! He's talking to the Salt Lake Tribune! SCO-watchers, breathe easy. The world, and Darl, have started to spin again.

I see that it's a Sunday story already noted in Groklaw, and just now making it into WLTSIM. Worth a read just for the contrast between the hard news up top and D. McB's comment halfway down:

"Our company has never been in a better position and we've never been more committed to our Unix business," he said. "We are preparing major updates of our products. . . . We are confident of our litigation efforts and we are well-funded to achieve many of the goals that we have as a company."

"It's only a flesh wound! Come back here, you coward!"

And check out the photo accompanying the story for confirmation that moral decay can't be kept hidden for long.

---

to post comments