Saving frequency scaling in the data center
Saving frequency scaling in the data center
Posted May 21, 2020 19:21 UTC (Thu) by josh (subscriber, #17465)Parent article: Saving frequency scaling in the data center
Back in the say, making *anything* conditional on "running on battery" was seen as a mistake. Is that still true today, though? Might that help make defaults work for more people?
Posted May 22, 2020 10:26 UTC (Fri)
by LtWorf (subscriber, #124958)
[Link] (1 responses)
In the case of browsers, the entire idea of making the CPU running faster to get the work done sooner does not work, because it's just endless loops all over the place.
Posted May 24, 2020 0:10 UTC (Sun)
by josh (subscriber, #17465)
[Link]
Posted May 25, 2020 0:39 UTC (Mon)
by marcH (subscriber, #57642)
[Link]
Weird. I love defaults that work in every case but power has obviously very different "prices" depending on the context:
1. Super expensive because I absolutely need my battery to last at least the day
OK, we probably don't want 5 or 10 different power settings like some Windows OEMs provide but two settings ("I care" vs "I don't care much") seems like a really bare minimum.
Saving frequency scaling in the data center
Saving frequency scaling in the data center
Saving frequency scaling in the data center
2. Somewhat expensive because my data center charges me - yet I value happy customers more.
3. A bit "expensive" because I don't want to get up from the couch and look for my charger
4. Free because my data center doesn't charge me.
Etc.