GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
In this walk-away settlement, GNOME receives a release and covenant not to be sued for any patent held by Rothschild Patent Imaging. Further, both Rothschild Patent Imaging and Leigh Rothschild are granting a release and covenant to any software that is released under an existing Open Source Initiative approved license (and subsequent versions thereof), including for the entire Rothschild portfolio of patents, to the extent such software forms a material part of the infringement allegation." There is no mention of what the foundation had to give — if anything — for this settlement,
Posted May 21, 2020 14:44 UTC (Thu)
by littlesandra88 (guest, #64017)
[Link] (8 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 15:49 UTC (Thu)
by higuita (guest, #32245)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 17:00 UTC (Thu)
by pkern (subscriber, #32883)
[Link]
Posted May 21, 2020 17:02 UTC (Thu)
by hannada (guest, #4633)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 17:27 UTC (Thu)
by Wol (subscriber, #4433)
[Link]
Cheers,
Posted May 28, 2020 19:01 UTC (Thu)
by zoobab (guest, #9945)
[Link] (3 responses)
Also, GNOME smells OIN and IBM, the first lobby that wants to restore software patents in the US via the STRONGER patent act.
Now Rpi can continue to troll and parasites other companies with their patent.
So much for 'victory' for freedom.
Posted May 28, 2020 19:15 UTC (Thu)
by mpr22 (subscriber, #60784)
[Link]
But only to the extent those companies are releasing proprietary software.
Posted May 28, 2020 21:09 UTC (Thu)
by madscientist (subscriber, #16861)
[Link] (1 responses)
If proprietary software companies want to fight that fight, they are more than welcome to do so and spend their money on it. If they don't want to fight and would rather pay royalties, that's fine with me too: it's their money.
But I'm very happy to see that FOSS becomes that much easier a choice to make (fewer patent troll issues) and that my investments in FOSS are not being used on legal battles that only benefit proprietary software instead of on making FOSS software stronger.
If there was no way to help FOSS without also helping proprietary companies (i.e., we had to go to court and invalidate the patents) then that's fine. And if the cost/effort/resources was the same to do both that's fine too. But if it costs the FOSS community much more to defend all software than it does to just defend FOSS software, then with our limited resources there's no question that the latter is the right choice to make.
BTW, I say this as someone who does develop proprietary software for $DAYJOB, and whose company is small and definitely not rich enough to take a big company to court (or defend against same)!
Posted Jun 2, 2020 14:44 UTC (Tue)
by nybble41 (subscriber, #55106)
[Link]
If proprietary software companies *lose* that fight, and thus create precedent in *favor* of software patents (de facto, if not de jure) that hurts everyone. Including FOSS projects. If you ignore the cases you're not personally sympathetic to there won't be anyone left to help when your turn comes.
Posted May 21, 2020 17:35 UTC (Thu)
by obrakmann (subscriber, #38108)
[Link]
According to Neil McGovern on Reddit, "not a penny": https://www.reddit.com/r/linux/comments/gnseuh/patent_cas...
Posted May 21, 2020 18:01 UTC (Thu)
by neilm (guest, #28422)
[Link] (6 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 19:09 UTC (Thu)
by rahulsundaram (subscriber, #21946)
[Link] (3 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 20:02 UTC (Thu)
by neilm (guest, #28422)
[Link] (2 responses)
Posted May 21, 2020 21:02 UTC (Thu)
by jake (editor, #205)
[Link]
sounds like some sort of weird non-disparagement clause?
jake
Posted May 21, 2020 21:15 UTC (Thu)
by mdolan (subscriber, #104340)
[Link]
Posted May 25, 2020 20:11 UTC (Mon)
by atai (subscriber, #10977)
[Link] (1 responses)
Posted May 25, 2020 21:24 UTC (Mon)
by amacater (subscriber, #790)
[Link]
Posted May 21, 2020 21:57 UTC (Thu)
by flussence (guest, #85566)
[Link]
Posted May 22, 2020 16:38 UTC (Fri)
by eru (subscriber, #2753)
[Link]
Posted May 23, 2020 12:29 UTC (Sat)
by pabs (subscriber, #43278)
[Link]
https://openuk.uk/gnome-settles-patent-litigation-amanda-...
Comments from another thread on HN:
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
Wol
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit
GNOME resolves Rothschild patent suit