The 2020 Power Management and Scheduling in the Linux Kernel Summit
Discussions held at this event include:
- Core scheduling: this work is getting closer to being ready to merge; what remains to be done?
- The weighted TEO cpuidle governor: an attempt to improve idle-time predictions.
- Testing scheduler thermal properties for avionics: an in-progress test bed to evaluate thermally-oriented scheduler changes.
- Utilization inversion and proxy execution: using load tracking for task placement can lead to some strange inversion situations; fixing them may not be entirely easy.
- The many faces of "latency nice": a complex and inclusive session on an incompletely designed feature.
- Scheduler benchmarking with MMTests: a test suite developed for memory-management benchmarking finds a new use case.
- Evaluating vendor changes to the scheduler: mobile vendors make a lot of tweaks to the CPU scheduler; why do they do that and what is gained from it?
- Bao: a lightweight partitioning hypervisor for mixed-criticality workloads.
- The pseudo cpuidle driver: a development tool for cpuidle governors.
- Saving frequency scaling in the data center: a call for a different compromise between performance and power efficiency.
- The deadline scheduler and CPU idle states: an unlikely combination of technologies that just might make sense.
- Imbalance detection and fairness in the CPU scheduler: how do you balance a workload that cannot be balanced?
- Hibernation in the cloud: an unlikely combination of technologies might just make sense.
The virtual setting of this conference made the traditional group photo impossible; instead, here is an attempt at a group screenshot:
Reporting from the 2020 event is now complete; many thanks to the OSPM organizers for putting together a productive and interesting event.
[Thanks to the Linux Foundation, LWN's travel sponsor, for supporting our
coverage of this event.]
Index entries for this article | |
---|---|
Conference | OS-Directed Power-Management Summit/2020 |