Avoiding retpolines with static calls
Avoiding retpolines with static calls
Posted Apr 4, 2020 17:18 UTC (Sat) by nix (subscriber, #2304)In reply to: Avoiding retpolines with static calls by ballombe
Parent article: Avoiding retpolines with static calls
I think that's overdoing it. Even C's done that, repeatedly. Do you blame the ANSI C committee for adding new keywords? (They added almost as many as C++ did.)
Posted Apr 6, 2020 15:03 UTC (Mon)
by mathstuf (subscriber, #69389)
[Link]
Avoiding retpolines with static calls
Aren't they all in the `_Upper` namespace (namepattern?) though? C reserved that long ago (and is why C++ can't use it either; C may add names there at any time).