Better tools for kernel developers
Better tools for kernel developers
Posted Feb 8, 2020 0:19 UTC (Sat) by neilbrown (subscriber, #359)In reply to: Better tools for kernel developers by rgmoore
Parent article: Better tools for kernel developers
Thanks for the link.  I was afraid it might only be settable globally.  This related directly to my point below...
> That said, even with old-fashioned plain text quoting, there were plenty of people who top posted because it was faster than quote/reply formatting. 
That's true and it doesn't bother me at all - providing they manage to communicate clearly.
I really don't care about the format, but I would like people to think about the message that they want to send, and then to create the message accordingly.
This means they need the tools available to create a useful message.  Sometimes top-posting is a perfectly good way to send a message, sometimes interleaving is best.  In the cases that I can think of that particularly bothered me, my correspondent clearly *was* trying to communicate usefully, but were impeded by their tool.
Having the tools available needs them available on a message-by-message basis, not as a global setting.
Having quote-with-prefix/quote-without-prefix/don't-quote as a global setting is a bit like having reply-to-sender/reply-to-all/forward be a global setting. (or html/plain-text being a global setting!!!)
      Posted Mar 3, 2020 17:09 UTC (Tue)
                               by nye (subscriber, #51576)
                              [Link] 
       
Also, when replying to a plain text email, it defaults to plain text so you don't need to change anything. 
I don't really want to defend Outlook too much since I kind of hate it, mostly for reasons not covered in this thread, but in this particular way I think its reputation is a bit unfair. 
     
    Better tools for kernel developers
      
 
           